GLIN vs. HODL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GLIN (VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF) and HODL (VanEck Bitcoin Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - GLIN is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MarketGrader India All-Cap Growth Leaders Index, while HODL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GLIN returned 0.38% vs -39.68% for HODL. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLIN charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for HODL.

Performance

GLIN vs. HODL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLIN achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly higher than HODL's -28.75% return.

GLIN

• 1D: -2.40%
• 1M: 4.54%
• YTD: 1.48%
• 6M: 0.11%
• 1Y: 0.38%
• 3Y*: 11.98%
• 5Y*: 5.66%
• 10Y*: 2.82%

HODL

• 1D: -3.24%
• 1M: -17.82%
• YTD: -28.75%
• 6M: -28.92%
• 1Y: -39.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLIN vs. HODL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GLIN VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF	1.48%	-5.47%	15.20%
HODL VanEck Bitcoin Trust	-28.75%	-6.42%	91.50%

Correlation

The correlation between GLIN and HODL is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.23

Return for Risk

GLIN vs. HODL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLIN

GLIN Risk / Return Rank: 9
GLIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
GLIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
GLIN Omega Ratio Rank: 8
GLIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
GLIN Martin Ratio Rank: 9

HODL

HODL Risk / Return Rank: 2
HODL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
HODL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
HODL Omega Ratio Rank: 2
HODL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
HODL Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLIN vs. HODL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLIN	HODL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.02	-0.90	+0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.16	-1.26	+1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	0.86	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.02	-0.77	+0.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.06	-1.30	+1.36

GLIN vs. HODL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLIN Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is higher than the HODL Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLIN and HODL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GLIN vs. HODL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLIN drawdown since its inception was -79.36%, which is greater than HODL's maximum drawdown of -51.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLIN and HODL.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLIN	HODL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.36%	-51.96%	-27.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.56%	-51.96%	+33.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.97%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-74.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.32%	-50.35%	+8.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.93%	-16.78%	-34.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.38%	30.49%	-24.11%

Volatility

GLIN vs. HODL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) is 6.25%, while VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) has a volatility of 13.07%. This indicates that GLIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HODL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLIN	HODL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.25%	13.07%	-6.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.84%	34.59%	-18.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.07%	44.11%	-26.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.32%	49.89%	-31.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.67%	49.89%	-26.22%

GLIN vs. HODL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLIN has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than HODL's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLIN vs. HODL - Dividend Comparison

GLIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, while HODL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLIN VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF	0.83%	0.84%	3.58%	0.96%	1.70%	0.00%	0.24%	1.42%	0.12%	0.10%	1.39%	3.11%
HODL VanEck Bitcoin Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLIN and HODL in my portfolio?

GLIN and HODL have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLIN or HODL?

HODL has higher volatility (13.07%) compared to GLIN (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLIN dropped -79.36% vs HODL's -51.96%.

Which ETF is better, GLIN or HODL?

On 1-year performance, GLIN leads with 0.38% vs -39.68% for HODL. On fees, HODL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GLIN has been the lower-risk option at 6.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GLIN or HODL?

Over the 1-year period, GLIN has performed better with a 0.38% return vs -39.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLIN or HODL?

HODL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for GLIN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLIN or HODL?

GLIN has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.00% for HODL.

What is the main difference between GLIN and HODL?

GLIN is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while HODL is Cryptocurrency. GLIN tracks MarketGrader India All-Cap Growth Leaders Index, while HODL tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for GLIN and 0.25% for HODL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.