GLIN vs. EEMS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS).

GLIN and EEMS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLIN is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketGrader India All-Cap Growth Leaders Index. It was launched on Aug 24, 2010. EEMS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index. It was launched on Aug 16, 2011. Both GLIN and EEMS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

GLIN vs. EEMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GLIN vs. EEMS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GLIN VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF	-10.69%	-5.47%	15.64%	36.13%	-21.46%	29.57%	-0.29%	-21.49%	-37.41%	66.53%
EEMS iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF	3.38%	19.78%	3.13%	23.09%	-19.12%	18.12%	19.47%	11.25%	-18.98%	34.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLIN achieves a -10.69% return, which is significantly lower than EEMS's 3.38% return. Over the past 10 years, GLIN has underperformed EEMS with an annualized return of 1.54%, while EEMS has yielded a comparatively higher 8.19% annualized return.

GLIN

• 1D: 1.53%
• 1M: -9.12%
• YTD: -10.69%
• 6M: -7.68%
• 1Y: -2.80%
• 3Y*: 10.93%
• 5Y*: 5.27%
• 10Y*: 1.54%

EEMS

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -5.33%
• YTD: 3.38%
• 6M: 4.76%
• 1Y: 27.44%
• 3Y*: 14.64%
• 5Y*: 6.60%
• 10Y*: 8.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLIN vs. EEMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLIN has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMS's 0.73% expense ratio.

GLIN

VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF

EEMS

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF

Return for Risk

GLIN vs. EEMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLIN

GLIN Risk / Return Rank: 9
GLIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
GLIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
GLIN Omega Ratio Rank: 8
GLIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
GLIN Martin Ratio Rank: 8

EEMS

EEMS Risk / Return Rank: 80
EEMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
EEMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
EEMS Omega Ratio Rank: 76
EEMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
EEMS Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLIN vs. EEMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLIN	EEMS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.15	1.56	-1.71
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.08	2.09	-2.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.30	-0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.17	2.68	-2.85
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.55	9.64	-10.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLIN vs. EEMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLIN Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the EEMS Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLIN and EEMS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLIN	EEMS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15	1.56	-1.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	0.42	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07	0.46	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.11	0.28	-0.40

Correlation

The correlation between GLIN and EEMS is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

GLIN vs. EEMS - Dividend Comparison

GLIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than EEMS's 2.99% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLIN VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF	0.94%	0.84%	3.58%	0.96%	1.70%	0.00%	0.24%	1.42%	0.12%	0.10%	1.39%	3.11%
EEMS iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF	2.99%	3.09%	2.60%	2.69%	0.89%	3.56%	2.14%	2.64%	3.06%	2.47%	2.51%	2.33%

Drawdowns

GLIN vs. EEMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLIN drawdown since its inception was -79.36%, which is greater than EEMS's maximum drawdown of -48.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLIN and EEMS.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLIN	EEMS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.36%	-48.89%	-30.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.56%	-10.99%	-7.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.97%	-27.07%	-3.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-74.80%	-48.89%	-25.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.24%	-7.86%	-41.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.04%	-10.60%	-40.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.73%	3.06%	+2.67%

Volatility

GLIN vs. EEMS - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) have volatilities of 7.93% and 8.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLIN	EEMS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.93%	8.24%	-0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.81%	12.39%	+0.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.55%	17.74%	+0.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.95%	15.69%	+2.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.62%	17.79%	+5.83%