PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDYX vs. GCOZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDYX vs. GCOZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX) and GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDYX achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly lower than GCOZX's 8.43% return. Over the past 10 years, GLDYX has underperformed GCOZX with an annualized return of 2.27%, while GCOZX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.86% annualized return.


GLDYX

1D
0.16%
1M
0.08%
6M
0.81%
YTD
0.89%
1Y
3.75%
3Y*
4.87%
5Y*
2.19%
10Y*
2.27%

GCOZX

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.55%
6M
6.60%
YTD
8.43%
1Y
16.61%
3Y*
13.74%
5Y*
6.61%
10Y*
8.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDYX vs. GCOZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLDYX
GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund
0.89%5.66%4.81%5.09%-4.42%-0.47%3.39%4.00%1.83%1.69%
GCOZX
GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund
8.43%16.13%12.05%16.57%-18.06%11.60%12.96%22.39%-7.50%18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDYX and GCOZX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2002

-0.03

The correlation between GLDYX and GCOZX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDYX vs. GCOZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDYX
GLDYX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GLDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

GCOZX
GCOZX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
GCOZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCOZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCOZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GCOZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCOZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDYX vs. GCOZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX) and GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLDYXGCOZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.28

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

2.00

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.84

8.57

+6.28

GLDYX vs. GCOZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the GCOZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDYX and GCOZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLDYX vs. GCOZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDYX drawdown since its inception was -11.73%, smaller than the maximum GCOZX drawdown of -47.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDYX and GCOZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDYXGCOZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.73%

-47.79%

+36.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.04%

-8.07%

+7.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.04%

-12.39%

+11.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.68%

-25.19%

+18.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.68%

-27.50%

+20.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.75%

+0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.15%

-6.50%

+4.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

1.88%

-1.63%

Volatility

GLDYX vs. GCOZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX) is 0.45%, while GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX) has a volatility of 3.35%. This indicates that GLDYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCOZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDYXGCOZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.45%

3.35%

-2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.07%

9.11%

-8.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39%

10.80%

-9.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.83%

12.16%

-10.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.56%

12.66%

-11.10%

GLDYX vs. GCOZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDYX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOZX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLDYX vs. GCOZX - Dividend Comparison

GLDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than GCOZX's 8.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCOZX
GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund
8.84%9.59%3.47%3.37%9.49%6.85%4.94%9.42%4.24%4.71%5.71%19.06%
GLDYX
GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund
4.09%4.32%4.31%3.36%1.72%1.02%1.70%2.49%2.87%1.60%1.66%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLDYX and GCOZX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCOZX has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to GLDYX (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDYX dropped -11.73% vs GCOZX's -47.79%.

GLDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDYX and GCOZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer