PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDYX vs. GSCYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDYX vs. GSCYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX) and GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDYX achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly lower than GSCYX's 13.67% return. Over the past 10 years, GLDYX has underperformed GSCYX with an annualized return of 2.27%, while GSCYX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.08% annualized return.


GLDYX

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.65%
6M
1.11%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
4.89%
5Y*
2.13%
10Y*
2.27%

GSCYX

1D
-0.36%
1M
2.27%
YTD
13.67%
6M
15.06%
1Y
29.52%
3Y*
14.26%
5Y*
5.45%
10Y*
10.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDYX vs. GSCYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLDYX
GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund
0.65%5.66%4.81%5.09%-4.42%-0.47%3.39%4.00%1.83%1.69%
GSCYX
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund
13.67%6.03%10.58%14.91%-17.84%22.04%20.07%25.28%-12.62%13.12%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDYX and GSCYX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2002

-0.10

The correlation between GLDYX and GSCYX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDYX vs. GSCYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDYX
GLDYX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
GLDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

GSCYX
GSCYX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GSCYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSCYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSCYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GSCYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSCYX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDYX vs. GSCYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX) and GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLDYXGSCYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.90

1.70

+1.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.72

2.43

+2.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.29

+0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

2.65

+1.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.47

9.85

+6.62

GLDYX vs. GSCYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is higher than the GSCYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDYX and GSCYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDYXGSCYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.90

1.70

+1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.17

0.23

+0.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.47

0.43

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.21

+0.45

Drawdowns

GLDYX vs. GSCYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDYX drawdown since its inception was -11.73%, smaller than the maximum GSCYX drawdown of -63.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDYX and GSCYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDYXGSCYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.73%

-63.53%

+51.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.04%

-11.07%

+10.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.04%

-26.51%

+25.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.68%

-33.95%

+27.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.68%

-40.83%

+34.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.87%

+0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.16%

-15.16%

+13.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

2.97%

-2.72%

Volatility

GLDYX vs. GSCYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX) is 0.44%, while GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that GLDYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSCYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDYXGSCYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.44%

4.95%

-4.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.01%

12.89%

-11.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39%

17.70%

-16.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.82%

23.51%

-21.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.55%

23.33%

-21.78%

GLDYX vs. GSCYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDYX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than GSCYX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLDYX vs. GSCYX - Dividend Comparison

GLDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, less than GSCYX's 9.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLDYX
GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund
4.10%4.32%4.31%3.36%1.72%1.02%1.70%2.49%2.87%1.60%1.66%1.03%
GSCYX
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund
9.94%11.30%6.14%2.65%5.13%16.30%1.07%3.87%24.79%7.81%1.46%6.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLDYX and GSCYX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSCYX has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to GLDYX (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDYX dropped -11.73% vs GSCYX's -63.53%.

GLDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDYX and GSCYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer