GLDYX vs. AAAU

In the year-to-date period, GLDYX achieves a 2.17% return, which is significantly lower than AAAU's 25.49% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

GLDYX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GLDYX Sharpe Ratio is 3.88, which is higher than the AAAU Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDYX and AAAU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

GLDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, while AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum GLDYX drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDYX and AAAU.

The current volatility for GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX) is 0.58%, while Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) has a volatility of 7.81%. This indicates that GLDYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.