GLDYX vs. AAAU
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU).
GLDYX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Aug 27, 2001. AAAU is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Jul 26, 2018.
Performance
GLDYX vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLDYX vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDYX GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund | 0.09% | 5.66% | 4.81% | 5.09% | -4.42% | -0.47% | 3.39% | 4.00% | 1.23% |
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF | 10.48% | 64.06% | 26.91% | 12.96% | -0.50% | -4.01% | 25.02% | 18.17% | 9.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDYX achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than AAAU's 10.48% return.
GLDYX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 4.10%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- 2.06%
- 10Y*
- 2.27%
AAAU
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- -10.64%
- YTD
- 10.48%
- 6M
- 23.10%
- 1Y
- 52.53%
- 3Y*
- 33.97%
- 5Y*
- 22.27%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLDYX vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDYX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLDYX vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank
GLDYX
AAAU
GLDYX vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLDYX | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.86 | 1.92 | +0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.57 | 2.35 | +2.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.35 | +0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.03 | 2.73 | +1.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.82 | 10.02 | +7.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDYX | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86 | 1.92 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.15 | 1.27 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 1.18 | -0.53 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDYX and AAAU is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GLDYX vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison
GLDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, while AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDYX GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund | 4.11% | 4.32% | 4.31% | 3.36% | 1.72% | 1.02% | 1.70% | 2.49% | 2.87% | 1.60% | 1.66% | 1.03% |
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GLDYX vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDYX drawdown since its inception was -11.73%, smaller than the maximum AAAU drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDYX and AAAU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDYX | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.73% | -21.63% | +9.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.04% | -19.13% | +18.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.68% | -20.94% | +14.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -11.65% | +11.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.17% | -6.01% | +3.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.23% | 5.21% | -4.98% |
Volatility
GLDYX vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX) is 0.61%, while Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that GLDYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLDYX | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.61% | 10.43% | -9.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.93% | 24.06% | -23.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44% | 27.50% | -26.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.81% | 17.58% | -15.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.55% | 16.92% | -15.37% |