GLDW vs. GLTR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GLDW (Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF) and GLTR (Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while GLTR is a Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. GLDW is actively managed, while GLTR is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GLDW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GLTR.

Performance

GLDW vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDW achieves a 2.22% return, which is significantly lower than GLTR's 3.34% return.

GLDW

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -3.61%
• YTD: 2.22%
• 6M: 4.68%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLTR

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -2.11%
• YTD: 3.34%
• 6M: 12.84%
• 1Y: 54.71%
• 3Y*: 33.17%
• 5Y*: 15.94%
• 10Y*: 13.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDW vs. GLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF	2.22%	7.63%
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF	3.34%	18.57%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDW and GLTR is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025	0.92

Return for Risk

GLDW vs. GLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLTR

GLTR Risk / Return Rank: 38
GLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
GLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
GLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 46
GLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
GLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDW vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLDW	GLTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.33	+0.16

Drawdowns

GLDW vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDW drawdown since its inception was -23.59%, smaller than the maximum GLTR drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDW and GLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLDW	GLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.59%	-55.70%	+32.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-29.70%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.70%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-29.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.57%	-25.51%	+3.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.84%	-28.83%	+19.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	12.76%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GLDW	GLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.28%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	35.36%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.99%	37.64%	-0.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.99%	23.63%	+13.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.99%	20.50%	+16.49%

GLDW vs. GLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GLTR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLDW vs. GLTR - Dividend Comparison

GLDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.25%, while GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF	19.25%	3.75%
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLDW and GLTR in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, GLDW and GLTR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, GLDW or GLTR?

On fees, GLTR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLDW or GLTR?

GLTR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GLDW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLDW or GLTR?

GLDW has the higher dividend yield at 19.25%, compared with 0.00% for GLTR.

What is the main difference between GLDW and GLTR?

GLDW is categorized as Derivative Income, while GLTR is Precious Metals. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GLDW and 0.60% for GLTR.