GLDN vs. FITZ
GLDN (Nicholas Gold Income ETF) and FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDN is a Gold fund actively managed by Nicholas, while FITZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Nicholas. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GLDN charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FITZ.
Performance
GLDN vs. FITZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GLDN
- 1D
- -6.72%
- 1M
- -12.29%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FITZ
- 1D
- -2.89%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDN vs. FITZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GLDN Nicholas Gold Income ETF | -8.25% |
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | -4.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDN and FITZ is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDN vs. FITZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Gold Income ETF (GLDN) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDN | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.33 | -5.11 | +3.79 |
Drawdowns
GLDN vs. FITZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDN drawdown since its inception was -28.04%, which is greater than FITZ's maximum drawdown of -4.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDN and FITZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDN | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.04% | -4.81% | -23.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.04% | -4.81% | -23.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.70% | -1.70% | -14.00% |
Volatility
GLDN vs. FITZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDN | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.85% | 18.34% | +23.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.85% | 18.34% | +23.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.85% | 18.34% | +23.51% |
GLDN vs. FITZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDN has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FITZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDN vs. FITZ - Dividend Comparison
GLDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, while FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | 0.00% |
GLDN Nicholas Gold Income ETF | 4.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDN and FITZ have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FITZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FITZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for GLDN.
GLDN has the higher dividend yield at 4.42%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.
GLDN is categorized as Gold, while FITZ is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for GLDN and 0.75% for FITZ.
Find the right allocation for GLDN and FITZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer