GLDN vs. FITZ
GLDN (Nicholas Gold Income ETF) and FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDN is a Gold fund actively managed by Nicholas, while FITZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Nicholas. Both are actively managed. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GLDN charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FITZ.
Performance
GLDN vs. FITZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GLDN
- 1D
- 6.18%
- 1M
- 3.13%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FITZ
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $938.89K | $813.99K | $3.56M | |
| $89.38K | $105.25K | $99.21K |
GLDN vs. FITZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GLDN Nicholas Gold Income ETF | -5.39% |
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | 0.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDN and FITZ is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDN vs. FITZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Gold Income ETF (GLDN) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLDN vs. FITZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDN drawdown since its inception was -36.20%, which is greater than FITZ's maximum drawdown of -7.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDN and FITZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDN | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.20% | -7.37% | -28.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.23% | -1.10% | -26.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.05% | -3.88% | -17.17% |
Volatility
GLDN vs. FITZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDN | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.00% | 16.27% | +25.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.00% | 16.27% | +25.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.00% | 16.27% | +25.73% |
GLDN vs. FITZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDN has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FITZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDN vs. FITZ - Dividend Comparison
GLDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.99%, while FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | 0.00% |
GLDN Nicholas Gold Income ETF | 6.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDN and FITZ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FITZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FITZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for GLDN.
GLDN has the higher dividend yield at 6.99%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.
GLDN is categorized as Gold, while FITZ is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for GLDN and 0.75% for FITZ.
Find the right allocation for GLDN and FITZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer