PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDN vs. FITZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDN vs. FITZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Gold Income ETF (GLDN) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GLDN

1D
-6.72%
1M
-12.29%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FITZ

1D
-2.89%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDN vs. FITZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GLDN and FITZ is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.89

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDN vs. FITZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Gold Income ETF (GLDN) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GLDN vs. FITZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDNFITZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.33

-5.11

+3.79

Drawdowns

GLDN vs. FITZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDN drawdown since its inception was -28.04%, which is greater than FITZ's maximum drawdown of -4.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDN and FITZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDNFITZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.04%

-4.81%

-23.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.04%

-4.81%

-23.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.70%

-1.70%

-14.00%

Volatility

GLDN vs. FITZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDNFITZDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.85%

18.34%

+23.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.85%

18.34%

+23.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.85%

18.34%

+23.51%

GLDN vs. FITZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDN has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FITZ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLDN vs. FITZ - Dividend Comparison

GLDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, while FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


GLDN and FITZ have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FITZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FITZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for GLDN.

GLDN has the higher dividend yield at 4.42%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.

GLDN is categorized as Gold, while FITZ is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for GLDN and 0.75% for FITZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDN and FITZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer