GLDN vs. BLOX
GLDN (Nicholas Gold Income ETF) and BLOX (Nicholas Crypto Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDN is a Gold fund actively managed by Nicholas, while BLOX is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Nicholas. Both are actively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLDN charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BLOX.
Performance
GLDN vs. BLOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GLDN
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -14.34%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLOX
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- -6.72%
- YTD
- 9.50%
- 6M
- 5.82%
- 1Y
- 9.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDN vs. BLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GLDN Nicholas Gold Income ETF | -25.75% |
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF | 21.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDN and BLOX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDN vs. BLOX — Risk / Return Rank
GLDN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BLOX
GLDN vs. BLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Gold Income ETF (GLDN) and Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLDN | BLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.07 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.20 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.40 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLDN vs. BLOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDN drawdown since its inception was -33.32%, smaller than the maximum BLOX drawdown of -47.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDN and BLOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDN | BLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.32% | -47.09% | +13.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -47.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.40% | -24.30% | -8.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.43% | -18.73% | +1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 23.61% | — |
Volatility
GLDN vs. BLOX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDN | BLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 40.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.22% | 54.11% | -10.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.22% | 53.82% | -10.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.22% | 53.82% | -10.60% |
GLDN vs. BLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDN has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BLOX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDN vs. BLOX - Dividend Comparison
GLDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%, less than BLOX's 43.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF | 43.21% | 22.69% |
GLDN Nicholas Gold Income ETF | 5.69% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDN and BLOX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BLOX is cheaper at 1.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLOX is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for GLDN.
BLOX has the higher dividend yield at 43.21%, compared with 5.69% for GLDN.
GLDN is categorized as Gold, while BLOX is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for GLDN and 1.03% for BLOX.
Find the right allocation for GLDN and BLOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer