GLDN vs. IAUI

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

GLDN (Nicholas Gold Income ETF) and IAUI (NEOS Gold High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDN is a Gold fund actively managed by Nicholas, while IAUI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GLDN charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for IAUI.

Performance

GLDN vs. IAUI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Gold Income ETF (GLDN) and NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GLDN

• 1D: 6.18%
• 1M: 3.13%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

IAUI

• 1D: 3.02%
• 1M: 1.94%
• 6M: -11.81%
• YTD: -3.16%
• 1Y: 15.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GLDN Nicholas Gold Income ETF	$89.38K	$105.25K	$99.21K
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF	$9.02M	$8.85M	$10.46M

GLDN vs. IAUI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GLDN Nicholas Gold Income ETF	-20.08%
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF	-11.52%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDN and IAUI is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026	0.90

Return for Risk

GLDN vs. IAUI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GLDN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IAUI

IAUI Risk / Return Rank: 24
IAUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
IAUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
IAUI Omega Ratio Rank: 27
IAUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
IAUI Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GLDN vs. IAUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Gold Income ETF (GLDN) and NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLDN	IAUI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.68	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.02	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.14	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.68	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1.53	—

Drawdowns

GLDN vs. IAUI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDN drawdown since its inception was -36.20%, which is greater than IAUI's maximum drawdown of -22.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDN and IAUI.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLDN	IAUI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.20%	-22.50%	-13.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-22.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.23%	-17.87%	-9.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.05%	-5.83%	-15.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.91%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GLDN	IAUI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.03%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	18.61%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.00%	22.28%	+19.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.00%	21.07%	+20.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.00%	21.07%	+20.93%

GLDN vs. IAUI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDN has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than IAUI's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLDN vs. IAUI - Dividend Comparison

GLDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.99%, less than IAUI's 13.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
GLDN Nicholas Gold Income ETF	6.99%	0.00%
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF	13.46%	6.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLDN and IAUI in my portfolio?

GLDN and IAUI have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GLDN or IAUI?

On fees, IAUI is cheaper at 0.78% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLDN or IAUI?

IAUI is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for GLDN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLDN or IAUI?

IAUI has the higher dividend yield at 13.46%, compared with 6.99% for GLDN.

What is the main difference between GLDN and IAUI?

GLDN is categorized as Gold, while IAUI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Neos. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for GLDN and 0.78% for IAUI.