FITZ vs. CLCG
FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) and CLCG (Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FITZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CLCG.
Performance
FITZ vs. CLCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FITZ
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLCG
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 5.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FITZ vs. CLCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | -1.72% |
CLCG Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF | -2.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between FITZ and CLCG is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FITZ vs. CLCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ) and Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF (CLCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FITZ vs. CLCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FITZ drawdown since its inception was -7.37%, smaller than the maximum CLCG drawdown of -16.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITZ and CLCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FITZ | CLCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -16.32% | +8.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.11% | -4.32% | +1.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.03% | -3.85% | -0.18% |
Volatility
FITZ vs. CLCG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FITZ | CLCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.03% | 17.72% | -0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 17.72% | -0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 17.72% | -0.69% |
FITZ vs. CLCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FITZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CLCG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FITZ vs. CLCG - Dividend Comparison
FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CLCG Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.06% | 0.07% |
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FITZ and CLCG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CLCG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CLCG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FITZ.
CLCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.
They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Crossmark. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FITZ and 0.50% for CLCG.
Find the right allocation for FITZ and CLCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer