FITZ vs. HYP
FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) and HYP (Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FITZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for HYP.
Performance
FITZ vs. HYP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FITZ
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYP
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- 26.28%
- 6M
- 21.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FITZ vs. HYP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | -5.35% |
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF | -4.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between FITZ and HYP is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FITZ vs. HYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ) and Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FITZ vs. HYP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FITZ drawdown since its inception was -6.70%, smaller than the maximum HYP drawdown of -19.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITZ and HYP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FITZ | HYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.70% | -19.58% | +12.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.70% | -7.32% | +0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.80% | -6.44% | +2.64% |
Volatility
FITZ vs. HYP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FITZ | HYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.29% | 43.24% | -25.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 43.24% | -25.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 43.24% | -25.95% |
FITZ vs. HYP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FITZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than HYP's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
FITZ vs. HYP - Dividend Comparison
FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF | 0.11% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FITZ and HYP have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FITZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FITZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HYP.
HYP has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.
They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Golden Eagle. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FITZ and 0.85% for HYP.
Find the right allocation for FITZ and HYP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer