FITZ vs. HYP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) and HYP (Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FITZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for HYP.

Performance

FITZ vs. HYP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ) and Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FITZ

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HYP

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: 6.48%
• YTD: 32.89%
• 6M: 28.18%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FITZ vs. HYP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF	-1.66%
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF	1.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FITZ and HYP is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.40

Return for Risk

FITZ vs. HYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ) and Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FITZ	HYP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-7.29	0.98	-8.27

Drawdowns

FITZ vs. HYP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITZ drawdown since its inception was -1.97%, smaller than the maximum HYP drawdown of -19.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITZ and HYP.

Drawdown Indicators

	FITZ	HYP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.97%	-19.58%	+17.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.97%	-1.11%	-0.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.08%	-6.42%	+5.34%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FITZ	HYP	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.74%	40.91%	-32.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.74%	40.91%	-32.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.74%	40.91%	-32.17%

FITZ vs. HYP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FITZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than HYP's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

FITZ vs. HYP - Dividend Comparison

FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.

Position	TTM	2025
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF	0.00%	0.00%
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF	0.10%	0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FITZ and HYP in my portfolio?

FITZ and HYP have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FITZ or HYP?

On fees, FITZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FITZ or HYP?

FITZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HYP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FITZ or HYP?

HYP has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.

What is the main difference between FITZ and HYP?

They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Golden Eagle. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FITZ and 0.85% for HYP.