GLD vs. MGV
GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) and MGV (Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while MGV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLD returned 12.56%/yr vs 12.77%/yr for MGV. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MGV.
Performance
GLD vs. MGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than MGV's 12.90% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GLD having a 12.56% annualized return and MGV not far ahead at 12.77%.
GLD
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -8.41%
- YTD
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 3.07%
- 1Y
- 30.18%
- 3Y*
- 29.71%
- 5Y*
- 17.55%
- 10Y*
- 12.56%
MGV
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 3.05%
- YTD
- 12.90%
- 6M
- 14.55%
- 1Y
- 26.25%
- 3Y*
- 18.43%
- 5Y*
- 12.03%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
GLD vs. MGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.24% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 12.90% | 15.45% | 16.94% | 9.16% | -1.22% | 25.93% | 2.50% | 25.54% | -4.13% | 16.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLD and MGV is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007 | 0.04 |
The correlation between GLD and MGV shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GLD vs. MGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLD
MGV
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
GLD
MGV
Communication Services
GLD
-
MGV
Consumer Cyclical
GLD
-
MGV
Consumer Defensive
GLD
-
MGV
Energy
GLD
-
MGV
Financial Services
GLD
-
MGV
Healthcare
GLD
-
MGV
Industrials
GLD
-
MGV
Real Estate
GLD
-
MGV
Technology
GLD
-
MGV
Utilities
GLD
-
MGV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLD vs. MGV — Risk / Return Rank
GLD
MGV
GLD vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLD | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.48 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 4.11 | -2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.78 | 15.60 | -11.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLD | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 2.66 | -1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.89 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.48 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
GLD vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum MGV drawdown of -55.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and MGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLD | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.56% | -55.87% | +10.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.10% | -6.42% | -13.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.10% | -13.18% | -6.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.03% | -16.54% | -4.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.00% | -35.41% | +13.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.89% | -0.98% | -18.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -7.69% | -8.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.01% | 1.69% | +6.32% |
Volatility
GLD vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) at 2.66%. This indicates that GLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLD | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.68% | 2.66% | +3.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.47% | 7.61% | +15.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.87% | 9.93% | +16.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 13.58% | +4.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 16.34% | -0.35% |
GLD vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than MGV's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLD vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison
GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 1.89% | 2.04% | 2.31% | 2.48% | 2.45% | 2.17% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 2.34% | 2.53% | 2.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLD and MGV have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLD has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to MGV (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs MGV's -55.87%.
On 10-year performance, MGV leads with 12.77% vs 12.56% for GLD. On fees, MGV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MGV has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 12.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.
MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
GLD is categorized as Gold, while MGV is Large Cap Value Equities. GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLD and 0.05% for MGV.
MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLD and MGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer