PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLD vs. MGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLD vs. MGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than MGV's 12.90% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GLD having a 12.56% annualized return and MGV not far ahead at 12.77%.


GLD

1D
0.26%
1M
-8.41%
YTD
0.24%
6M
3.07%
1Y
30.18%
3Y*
29.71%
5Y*
17.55%
10Y*
12.56%

MGV

1D
0.48%
1M
3.05%
YTD
12.90%
6M
14.55%
1Y
26.25%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
12.03%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLD vs. MGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.24%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
12.90%15.45%16.94%9.16%-1.22%25.93%2.50%25.54%-4.13%16.85%

Correlation

The correlation between GLD and MGV is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007

0.04

The correlation between GLD and MGV shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GLD vs. MGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GLD
MGV

Basic Materials

100.0%
2.4%

Communication Services

-

3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

11.9%

Energy

-

6.6%

Financial Services

-

23.9%

Healthcare

-

16.6%

Industrials

-

13.7%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Technology

-

14.2%

Utilities

-

2.6%

Basic Materials

GLD
100.0%
MGV
2.4%

Communication Services

GLD

-

MGV
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

GLD

-

MGV
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

GLD

-

MGV
11.9%

Energy

GLD

-

MGV
6.6%

Financial Services

GLD

-

MGV
23.9%

Healthcare

GLD

-

MGV
16.6%

Industrials

GLD

-

MGV
13.7%

Real Estate

GLD

-

MGV
1.2%

Technology

GLD

-

MGV
14.2%

Utilities

GLD

-

MGV
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLD vs. MGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

MGV
MGV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLD vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLDMGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.48

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

4.11

-2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.78

15.60

-11.82

GLD vs. MGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the MGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLD and MGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDMGVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

2.66

-1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.89

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.78

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.48

+0.11

Drawdowns

GLD vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum MGV drawdown of -55.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and MGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDMGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

-55.87%

+10.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.10%

-6.42%

-13.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.10%

-13.18%

-6.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.03%

-16.54%

-4.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.00%

-35.41%

+13.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.89%

-0.98%

-18.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-7.69%

-8.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.01%

1.69%

+6.32%

Volatility

GLD vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) at 2.66%. This indicates that GLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDMGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

2.66%

+3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.47%

7.61%

+15.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.87%

9.93%

+16.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.07%

13.58%

+4.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.99%

16.34%

-0.35%

GLD vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than MGV's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLD vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison

GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
1.89%2.04%2.31%2.48%2.45%2.17%2.47%2.69%2.65%2.34%2.53%2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLD and MGV have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLD has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to MGV (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs MGV's -55.87%.

On 10-year performance, MGV leads with 12.77% vs 12.56% for GLD. On fees, MGV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MGV has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 12.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

GLD is categorized as Gold, while MGV is Large Cap Value Equities. GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLD and 0.05% for MGV.

MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLD and MGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer