GK vs. MSOX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

GK (AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF) and MSOX (Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while MSOX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GK returned 17.67%/yr vs -66.19%/yr for MSOX. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for MSOX.

Performance

GK vs. MSOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GK achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly higher than MSOX's -49.78% return.

GK

• 1D: 1.82%
• 1M: -0.91%
• 6M: 11.15%
• YTD: 12.37%
• 1Y: 17.72%
• 3Y*: 17.67%
• 5Y*: 2.34%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.85%

MSOX

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -27.88%
• 6M: -29.47%
• YTD: -49.78%
• 1Y: -44.58%
• 3Y*: -66.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -74.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF	$27.34K	$30.78K	$45.67K
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF	$3.57M	$4.33M	$7.32M

GK vs. MSOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF	12.37%	17.78%	20.10%	21.19%	-17.44%
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF	-49.78%	-51.20%	-87.32%	-39.26%	-76.29%

Correlation

The correlation between GK and MSOX is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2022	0.27

GK vs. MSOX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GK	MSOX
Technology	38.4%	-
Industrials	16.1%	-
Communication Services	15.4%	-
Healthcare	10.0%	-
Financial Services	7.9%	184.5%
Utilities	4.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

GK vs. MSOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GK

GK Risk / Return Rank: 35
GK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
GK Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
GK Omega Ratio Rank: 34
GK Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
GK Martin Ratio Rank: 38

MSOX

MSOX Risk / Return Rank: 16
MSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
MSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
MSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
MSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
MSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GK vs. MSOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GK	MSOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	-0.21	+1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	1.25	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.14	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.18	-0.53	+1.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.00	-0.71	+4.71

GK vs. MSOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GK Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the MSOX Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GK and MSOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GK vs. MSOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GK drawdown since its inception was -47.72%, smaller than the maximum MSOX drawdown of -99.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GK and MSOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GK	MSOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.72%	-99.75%	+52.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.13%	-84.89%	+69.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.62%	-98.83%	+75.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.59%	-99.67%	+95.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.36%	-89.20%	+65.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.44%	62.54%	-58.10%

Volatility

GK vs. MSOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) is 7.21%, while Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) has a volatility of 24.93%. This indicates that GK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GK	MSOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.21%	24.93%	-17.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.42%	110.30%	-93.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.80%	217.42%	-197.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.13%	166.42%	-142.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.01%	166.42%	-142.41%

GK vs. MSOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MSOX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

GK vs. MSOX - Dividend Comparison

GK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while MSOX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF	0.07%	0.08%	0.00%	0.13%	1.30%	0.04%
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GK and MSOX in my portfolio?

GK and MSOX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GK or MSOX?

MSOX has higher volatility (24.93%) compared to GK (7.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GK dropped -47.72% vs MSOX's -99.75%.

Which ETF is better, GK or MSOX?

On 3-year performance, GK leads with 17.67% vs -66.19% for MSOX. On fees, GK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GK has been the lower-risk option at 7.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GK or MSOX?

Over the 3-year period, GK has performed better with a 17.67% return vs -66.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GK or MSOX?

GK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MSOX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GK or MSOX?

GK has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for MSOX.

What is the main difference between GK and MSOX?

GK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MSOX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GK and 0.95% for MSOX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.