GK vs. HDGE

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

GK (AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF) and HDGE (AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while HDGE is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GK returned 2.96%/yr vs -4.27%/yr for HDGE. At a correlation of -0.69, they often move in opposite directions. GK charges 0.75%/yr vs 3.36%/yr for HDGE.

Performance

GK vs. HDGE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GK achieves a 11.28% return, which is significantly higher than HDGE's -0.94% return.

GK

• 1D: -1.75%
• 1M: -0.99%
• 6M: 7.51%
• YTD: 11.28%
• 1Y: 19.05%
• 3Y*: 15.64%
• 5Y*: 2.96%
• 10Y*: —

HDGE

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: -3.41%
• 6M: 0.38%
• YTD: -0.94%
• 1Y: -0.46%
• 3Y*: -2.96%
• 5Y*: -4.27%
• 10Y*: -15.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GK vs. HDGE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF	11.28%	17.78%	20.10%	21.19%	-42.76%	4.61%
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF	-0.94%	1.50%	-8.01%	-26.98%	16.59%	7.87%

Correlation

The correlation between GK and HDGE is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021	-0.69

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between GK and HDGE has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.69 to -0.32, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

GK vs. HDGE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GK	HDGE
Technology	36.9%	-19.1%
Industrials	16.6%	-14.8%
Communication Services	16.4%	-3.8%
Healthcare	9.3%	-1.7%
Financial Services	7.2%	-19.5%
Utilities	5.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.0%	-24.0%
Consumer Defensive	2.0%	-3.9%
Basic Materials	-	-1.4%
Energy	-	-2.5%
Real Estate	-	-13.7%

Return for Risk

GK vs. HDGE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GK

GK Risk / Return Rank: 34
GK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
GK Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
GK Omega Ratio Rank: 34
GK Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
GK Martin Ratio Rank: 38

HDGE

HDGE Risk / Return Rank: 9
HDGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
HDGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
HDGE Omega Ratio Rank: 8
HDGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
HDGE Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GK vs. HDGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GK	HDGE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	-0.03	+1.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	0.10	+1.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.01	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	-0.03	+1.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.62	-0.07	+4.69

GK vs. HDGE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GK Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the HDGE Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GK and HDGE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GK vs. HDGE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GK drawdown since its inception was -47.72%, smaller than the maximum HDGE drawdown of -93.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GK and HDGE.

Drawdown Indicators

	GK	HDGE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.72%	-93.88%	+46.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.13%	-15.40%	+0.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.62%	-29.46%	+5.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.72%	-42.97%	-4.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-81.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.52%	-93.50%	+87.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.56%	-70.25%	+46.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.13%	6.50%	-2.37%

Volatility

GK vs. HDGE - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) has a higher volatility of 7.08% compared to AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) at 6.16%. This indicates that GK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GK	HDGE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.08%	6.16%	+0.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.47%	13.77%	+1.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.96%	18.49%	+0.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.02%	24.26%	-0.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.97%	23.45%	+0.52%

GK vs. HDGE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than HDGE's 3.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

GK vs. HDGE - Dividend Comparison

GK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than HDGE's 3.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF	0.07%	0.08%	0.00%	0.13%	1.30%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF	3.53%	3.50%	7.83%	9.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GK and HDGE in my portfolio?

GK and HDGE have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GK or HDGE?

GK has higher volatility (7.08%) compared to HDGE (6.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GK dropped -47.72% vs HDGE's -93.88%.

Which ETF is better, GK or HDGE?

On 5-year performance, GK leads with 2.96% vs -4.27% for HDGE. On fees, GK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, HDGE has been the lower-risk option at 6.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GK or HDGE?

Over the 5-year period, GK has performed better with a 2.96% return vs -4.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GK or HDGE?

GK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GK or HDGE?

HDGE has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 0.07% for GK.

What is the main difference between GK and HDGE?

GK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while HDGE is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GK and 3.36% for HDGE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.