GK vs. GARY

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

GK (AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF) and GARY (Mango Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GARY.

Performance

GK vs. GARY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GK achieves a 11.28% return, which is significantly lower than GARY's 30.03% return.

GK

• 1D: -1.75%
• 1M: -0.99%
• 6M: 7.51%
• YTD: 11.28%
• 1Y: 19.05%
• 3Y*: 15.64%
• 5Y*: 2.96%
• 10Y*: —

GARY

• 1D: -1.55%
• 1M: -0.00%
• 6M: 22.99%
• YTD: 30.03%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GK vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF	11.28%	0.27%
GARY Mango Growth ETF	30.03%	0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between GK and GARY is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025	0.85

Return for Risk

GK vs. GARY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GK

GK Risk / Return Rank: 34
GK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
GK Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
GK Omega Ratio Rank: 34
GK Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
GK Martin Ratio Rank: 38

GARY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GK vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GK	GARY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.62	—	—

Drawdowns

GK vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GK drawdown since its inception was -47.72%, which is greater than GARY's maximum drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GK and GARY.

Drawdown Indicators

	GK	GARY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.72%	-10.28%	-37.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.52%	-5.23%	-0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.56%	-1.87%	-21.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.13%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GK	GARY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.08%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.47%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.96%	21.84%	-2.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.02%	21.84%	+2.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.97%	21.84%	+2.13%

GK vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

GK vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison

GK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, more than GARY's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GARY Mango Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF	0.07%	0.08%	0.00%	0.13%	1.30%	0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GK and GARY in my portfolio?

GK and GARY have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GK or GARY?

On fees, GK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GK or GARY?

GK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GK or GARY?

GK has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.04% for GARY.

What is the main difference between GK and GARY?

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GK and 0.77% for GARY.