GIS vs. T
GIS (General Mills, Inc.) and T (AT&T Inc.) are both stocks. GIS operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, GIS returned -2.58%/yr vs 2.10%/yr for T. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GIS vs. T - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -15.22% return, which is significantly lower than T's -7.04% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has underperformed T with an annualized return of -2.58%, while T has yielded a comparatively higher 2.10% annualized return.
GIS
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 14.39%
- 6M
- -12.66%
- YTD
- -15.22%
- 1Y
- -20.32%
- 3Y*
- -17.57%
- 5Y*
- -4.99%
- 10Y*
- -2.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.23%
T
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- 6M
- -2.84%
- YTD
- -7.04%
- 1Y
- -13.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 2.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.35%
GIS vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -15.22% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
T AT&T Inc. | -7.04% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIS and T is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1984 | 0.30 |
Fundamentals
GIS:
$20.06B
T:
$152.52B
GIS:
-$0.16
T:
$3.05
GIS:
1.10
T:
1.25
GIS:
$18.42B
T:
$125.65B
GIS:
$6.19B
T:
$105.41B
GIS:
$300.90M
T:
$54.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIS vs. T — Risk / Return Rank
GIS
T
GIS vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIS | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.92 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | -0.46 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.14 | -1.03 | -0.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIS vs. T - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -59.63%, smaller than the maximum T drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and T.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIS | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.63% | -64.15% | +4.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.48% | -28.89% | -5.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.45% | -28.89% | -24.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.63% | -32.01% | -27.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.63% | -42.35% | -17.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.03% | -21.57% | -30.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.38% | -15.74% | +5.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.80% | 12.94% | +4.86% |
Volatility
GIS vs. T - Volatility Comparison
General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a higher volatility of 12.90% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 9.59%. This indicates that GIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIS | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.90% | 9.59% | +3.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.53% | 19.91% | +1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.43% | 23.72% | +2.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 24.38% | -2.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.42% | 23.92% | -1.50% |
Dividends
GIS vs. T - Dividend Comparison
GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.49%, less than T's 6.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 6.49% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
T AT&T Inc. | 6.58% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Financials
GIS vs. T - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GIS and T have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIS has higher volatility (12.90%) compared to T (9.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIS dropped -59.63% vs T's -64.15%.
T currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIS and T
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer