GIS vs. T
GIS (General Mills, Inc.) and T (AT&T Inc.) are both stocks. GIS operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, GIS returned -2.63%/yr vs 3.33%/yr for T. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GIS vs. T - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -23.47% return, which is significantly lower than T's -2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has underperformed T with an annualized return of -2.63%, while T has yielded a comparatively higher 3.33% annualized return.
GIS
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- -23.47%
- 6M
- -23.78%
- 1Y
- -33.38%
- 3Y*
- -21.38%
- 5Y*
- -7.83%
- 10Y*
- -2.63%
T
- 1D
- 2.52%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- -2.96%
- 6M
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- -12.96%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.38%
- 10Y*
- 3.33%
GIS vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -23.47% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
T AT&T Inc. | -2.96% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIS and T is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1984 | 0.30 |
Fundamentals
GIS:
$4.08
T:
$3.04
GIS:
8.45
T:
7.74
GIS:
3.64
T:
0.32
GIS:
1.02
T:
1.35
GIS:
$18.37B
T:
$125.65B
GIS:
$4.70B
T:
$105.41B
GIS:
$3.03B
T:
$54.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIS vs. T — Risk / Return Rank
GIS
T
GIS vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIS | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.92 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | -0.59 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.86 | -1.22 | -0.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIS vs. T - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -59.63%, smaller than the maximum T drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and T.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIS | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.63% | -64.15% | +4.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.85% | -21.87% | -14.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.32% | -21.87% | -33.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.63% | -32.01% | -27.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.63% | -42.35% | -17.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.70% | -18.12% | -38.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.28% | -15.72% | +5.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.06% | 10.64% | +8.42% |
Volatility
GIS vs. T - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) is 6.25%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 8.21%. This indicates that GIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIS | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.25% | 8.21% | -1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.81% | 17.80% | +1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.96% | 22.13% | +1.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.14% | 24.01% | -2.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.10% | 23.73% | -1.63% |
Dividends
GIS vs. T - Dividend Comparison
GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%, more than T's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 7.07% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
T AT&T Inc. | 4.71% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Financials
GIS vs. T - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GIS and T have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
T has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to GIS (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIS dropped -59.63% vs T's -64.15%.
T currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.59 vs -1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIS and T
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer