GIS vs. SCHD
GIS (General Mills, Inc.) is a stock, while SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Over the past 10 years, GIS returned -3.08%/yr vs 12.65%/yr for SCHD. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GIS vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -26.51% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 18.71% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of -3.08%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.65% annualized return.
GIS
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -4.44%
- YTD
- -26.51%
- 6M
- -25.64%
- 1Y
- -36.06%
- 3Y*
- -22.93%
- 5Y*
- -8.46%
- 10Y*
- -3.08%
SCHD
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 18.71%
- 6M
- 19.28%
- 1Y
- 26.37%
- 3Y*
- 14.73%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.65%
GIS vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -26.51% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 18.71% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIS and SCHD is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIS vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
GIS
SCHD
GIS vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GIS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 1.43 | -0.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | 5.74 | -6.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.94 | 14.06 | -16.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GIS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.52 | 2.43 | -3.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.40 | 0.59 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.14 | 0.76 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.86 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
GIS vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -59.63%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.63% | -33.37% | -26.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.97% | -4.61% | -33.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.56% | -16.13% | -39.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.63% | -16.85% | -42.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.63% | -33.37% | -26.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.42% | -1.64% | -56.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.27% | -3.32% | -6.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.63% | 1.88% | +16.75% |
Volatility
GIS vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.83%. This indicates that GIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 2.83% | +4.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.58% | 7.60% | +10.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.84% | 10.94% | +12.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 14.38% | +6.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.09% | 16.72% | +5.37% |
Dividends
GIS vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than SCHD's 3.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 7.36% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.27% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIS and SCHD have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIS has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to SCHD (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIS dropped -59.63% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs -1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIS and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer