MDLZ vs. LW

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW).

Performance

MDLZ vs. LW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MDLZ vs. LW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc.	8.00%	-7.03%	-15.30%	11.17%	2.92%	15.87%	8.58%	40.42%	-4.27%	-1.58%
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.	1.72%	-35.69%	-37.01%	22.32%	42.89%	-18.40%	-7.23%	18.27%	31.81%	51.77%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MDLZ : $74.47B LW : $5.90B
EPS MDLZ : $1.89 LW : $2.80
PE Ratio MDLZ : 30.53 LW : 15.10
PS Ratio MDLZ : 1.94 LW : 0.91
PB Ratio MDLZ : 2.88 LW : 3.36
Total Revenue (TTM) MDLZ : $38.54B LW : $6.47B
Gross Profit (TTM) MDLZ : $10.94B LW : $1.43B
EBITDA (TTM) MDLZ : $4.50B LW : $1.02B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDLZ achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly higher than LW's 1.72% return.

MDLZ

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -5.59%
• YTD: 8.00%
• 6M: -6.08%
• 1Y: -12.22%
• 3Y*: -3.49%
• 5Y*: 2.33%
• 10Y*: 5.84%

LW

• 1D: 3.20%
• 1M: -12.31%
• YTD: 1.72%
• 6M: -26.19%
• 1Y: -18.47%
• 3Y*: -24.54%
• 5Y*: -9.99%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MDLZ vs. LW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDLZ

MDLZ Risk / Return Rank: 22
MDLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
MDLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
MDLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 18
MDLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
MDLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 29

LW

LW Risk / Return Rank: 24
LW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
LW Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
LW Omega Ratio Rank: 23
LW Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
LW Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDLZ vs. LW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MDLZ	LW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.55	-0.41	-0.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.64	-0.29	-0.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	0.96	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.44	-0.50	+0.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.85	-1.02	+0.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MDLZ vs. LW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDLZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the LW Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDLZ and LW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MDLZ	LW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.55	-0.41	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	-0.27	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.15	+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between MDLZ and LW is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MDLZ vs. LW - Dividend Comparison

MDLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than LW's 3.53% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc.	3.42%	3.60%	3.00%	2.24%	2.21%	2.01%	2.05%	1.98%	2.40%	1.92%	1.62%	1.43%
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.	3.53%	3.53%	2.15%	1.04%	1.10%	1.48%	1.17%	0.93%	1.04%	1.33%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MDLZ vs. LW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDLZ drawdown since its inception was -42.52%, smaller than the maximum LW drawdown of -63.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDLZ and LW.

Drawdown Indicators

	MDLZ	LW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.52%	-63.28%	+20.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.93%	-39.25%	+13.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.14%	-63.28%	+34.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.02%	-61.08%	+41.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.99%	-20.47%	+9.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.53%	19.08%	-5.55%

Volatility

MDLZ vs. LW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) is 7.49%, while Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) has a volatility of 10.82%. This indicates that MDLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MDLZ	LW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.49%	10.82%	-3.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.33%	36.99%	-20.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.47%	45.05%	-22.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.22%	37.42%	-18.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.02%	35.82%	-14.80%

Financials

MDLZ vs. LW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mondelez International, Inc. and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MDLZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mondelez International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.96B and revenue of 10.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.2%.

LW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 324.30M and revenue of 1.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.

MDLZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mondelez International, Inc. reported an operating income of 952.00M and revenue of 10.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.

LW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 139.20M and revenue of 1.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.6%.

MDLZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mondelez International, Inc. reported a net income of 665.00M and revenue of 10.50B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.

LW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 62.10M and revenue of 1.62B, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.