PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MDLZ vs. LW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MDLZ and LW is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

MDLZ vs. LW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-14.14%
-24.55%
MDLZ
LW

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MDLZ:

-1.17

LW:

-0.89

Sortino Ratio

MDLZ:

-1.65

LW:

-1.00

Omega Ratio

MDLZ:

0.82

LW:

0.80

Calmar Ratio

MDLZ:

-0.81

LW:

-0.82

Martin Ratio

MDLZ:

-1.89

LW:

-1.50

Ulcer Index

MDLZ:

10.83%

LW:

29.22%

Daily Std Dev

MDLZ:

17.45%

LW:

49.58%

Max Drawdown

MDLZ:

-38.16%

LW:

-53.32%

Current Drawdown

MDLZ:

-24.46%

LW:

-47.46%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MDLZ:

$75.74B

LW:

$8.42B

EPS

MDLZ:

$2.82

LW:

$2.54

PE Ratio

MDLZ:

20.09

LW:

23.24

PEG Ratio

MDLZ:

4.51

LW:

3.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

MDLZ:

$26.84B

LW:

$6.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MDLZ:

$10.25B

LW:

$1.45B

EBITDA (TTM)

MDLZ:

$6.00B

LW:

$871.20M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDLZ achieves a -5.17% return, which is significantly higher than LW's -11.69% return.


MDLZ

YTD

-5.17%

1M

-7.15%

6M

-14.40%

1Y

-20.14%

5Y*

2.93%

10Y*

6.63%

LW

YTD

-11.69%

1M

-28.21%

6M

-24.48%

1Y

-44.49%

5Y*

-6.92%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MDLZ vs. LW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDLZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MDLZ is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MDLZ is 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MDLZ is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MDLZ is 77
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MDLZ is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MDLZ is 11
Martin Ratio Rank

LW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LW is 77
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LW is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LW is 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LW is 66
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LW is 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LW is 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MDLZ vs. LW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MDLZ, currently valued at -1.17, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.00-1.17-0.89
The chart of Sortino ratio for MDLZ, currently valued at -1.65, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-1.65-1.00
The chart of Omega ratio for MDLZ, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.820.80
The chart of Calmar ratio for MDLZ, currently valued at -0.81, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.81-0.82
The chart of Martin ratio for MDLZ, currently valued at -1.89, compared to the broader market-30.00-20.00-10.000.0010.0020.00-1.89-1.50
MDLZ
LW

The current MDLZ Sharpe Ratio is -1.17, which is lower than the LW Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDLZ and LW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-1.17
-0.89
MDLZ
LW

Dividends

MDLZ vs. LW - Dividend Comparison

MDLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, more than LW's 2.44% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
3.16%3.00%2.24%2.21%2.01%2.05%1.98%2.40%1.92%1.62%1.43%1.60%
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
2.44%2.15%1.04%1.10%1.48%1.17%0.93%1.04%1.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MDLZ vs. LW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDLZ drawdown since its inception was -38.16%, smaller than the maximum LW drawdown of -53.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDLZ and LW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-24.46%
-47.46%
MDLZ
LW

Volatility

MDLZ vs. LW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) is 5.86%, while Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) has a volatility of 25.68%. This indicates that MDLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.86%
25.68%
MDLZ
LW

Financials

MDLZ vs. LW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mondelez International, Inc. and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab