GIS vs. CHD
GIS (General Mills, Inc.) and CHD (Church & Dwight Co., Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — GIS in Packaged Foods, CHD in Household & Personal Products. Over the past 10 years, GIS returned -2.69%/yr vs 8.07%/yr for CHD. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GIS vs. CHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -16.19% return, which is significantly lower than CHD's 14.92% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has underperformed CHD with an annualized return of -2.69%, while CHD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.07% annualized return.
GIS
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- 13.09%
- 6M
- -13.54%
- YTD
- -16.19%
- 1Y
- -19.76%
- 3Y*
- -17.88%
- 5Y*
- -5.14%
- 10Y*
- -2.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.20%
CHD
- 1D
- -2.09%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- 14.92%
- 1Y
- 0.53%
- 3Y*
- 0.38%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- 8.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.03%
GIS vs. CHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -16.19% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 14.92% | -18.91% | 11.96% | 18.72% | -20.41% | 18.89% | 25.46% | 8.36% | 33.23% | 15.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIS and CHD is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 1986 | 0.28 |
Over the past year, GIS and CHD have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
GIS:
$19.83B
CHD:
$22.68B
GIS:
-$0.16
CHD:
$3.04
GIS:
1.09
CHD:
3.72
GIS:
2.71
CHD:
5.45
GIS:
$18.42B
CHD:
$6.21B
GIS:
$6.19B
CHD:
$2.80B
GIS:
$300.90M
CHD:
$1.22B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIS vs. CHD — Risk / Return Rank
GIS
CHD
GIS vs. CHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIS | CHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.02 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 0.03 | -0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.11 | 0.06 | -1.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIS vs. CHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -59.63%, which is greater than CHD's maximum drawdown of -51.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and CHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIS | CHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.63% | -51.52% | -8.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.48% | -16.36% | -18.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.45% | -27.28% | -26.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.63% | -31.72% | -27.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.63% | -31.72% | -27.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.58% | -14.04% | -38.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.39% | -12.01% | +1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.86% | 9.19% | +8.67% |
Volatility
GIS vs. CHD - Volatility Comparison
General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a higher volatility of 13.02% compared to Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) at 7.63%. This indicates that GIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIS | CHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.02% | 7.63% | +5.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.43% | 16.56% | +4.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.40% | 22.85% | +3.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 20.85% | +1.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.42% | 21.92% | +0.50% |
Dividends
GIS vs. CHD - Dividend Comparison
GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, more than CHD's 1.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 1.26% | 1.41% | 1.08% | 1.15% | 1.30% | 0.99% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 1.32% | 1.51% | 1.61% | 1.58% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 6.57% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
Financials
GIS vs. CHD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and Church & Dwight Co., Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GIS vs. CHD - Profitability Comparison
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.60B and revenue of 4.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
CHD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 681.40M and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.4%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.09B and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in an operating margin of -45.4%.
CHD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported an operating income of 291.00M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.8%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of -2.01B and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in a net margin of -43.6%.
CHD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported a net income of 216.30M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GIS and CHD have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIS has higher volatility (13.02%) compared to CHD (7.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIS dropped -59.63% vs CHD's -51.52%.
CHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIS and CHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer