CHD vs. BMI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) and Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI).

Performance

CHD vs. BMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) and Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CHD vs. BMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc.	11.08%	-18.91%	11.96%	18.72%	-20.41%	18.89%	25.46%	8.36%	33.23%	15.33%
BMI Badger Meter, Inc.	-11.35%	-17.15%	38.28%	42.58%	3.23%	14.11%	46.37%	33.46%	4.09%	30.91%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CHD : $22.25B BMI : $4.56B
EPS CHD : $3.02 BMI : $4.79
PE Ratio CHD : 30.78 BMI : 32.19
PEG Ratio CHD : 3.36 BMI : 1.35
PS Ratio CHD : 3.66 BMI : 4.97
Total Revenue (TTM) CHD : $6.20B BMI : $916.66M
Gross Profit (TTM) CHD : $2.77B BMI : $382.07M
EBITDA (TTM) CHD : $1.31B BMI : $223.24M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHD achieves a 11.08% return, which is significantly higher than BMI's -11.35% return. Over the past 10 years, CHD has underperformed BMI with an annualized return of 8.48%, while BMI has yielded a comparatively higher 17.64% annualized return.

CHD

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -10.68%
• YTD: 11.08%
• 6M: 6.30%
• 1Y: -14.08%
• 3Y*: 2.85%
• 5Y*: 2.63%
• 10Y*: 8.48%

BMI

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: 1.32%
• YTD: -11.35%
• 6M: -12.28%
• 1Y: -19.28%
• 3Y*: 8.96%
• 5Y*: 10.80%
• 10Y*: 17.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CHD vs. BMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHD

CHD Risk / Return Rank: 18
CHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
CHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
CHD Omega Ratio Rank: 15
CHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
CHD Martin Ratio Rank: 25

BMI

BMI Risk / Return Rank: 23
BMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
BMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
BMI Omega Ratio Rank: 19
BMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
BMI Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHD vs. BMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) and Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHD	BMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.63	-0.50	-0.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.77	-0.46	-0.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	0.93	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.57	-0.43	-0.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.90	-0.68	-0.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHD vs. BMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHD Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is comparable to the BMI Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHD and BMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHD	BMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.63	-0.50	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	0.34	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	0.54	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.46	+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between CHD and BMI is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CHD vs. BMI - Dividend Comparison

CHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than BMI's 1.00% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc.	1.28%	1.41%	1.08%	1.15%	1.30%	0.99%	1.10%	1.29%	1.32%	1.51%	1.61%	1.58%
BMI Badger Meter, Inc.	1.00%	0.85%	0.58%	0.64%	0.78%	0.71%	0.74%	0.99%	1.14%	1.03%	1.16%	1.33%

Drawdowns

CHD vs. BMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHD drawdown since its inception was -51.52%, smaller than the maximum BMI drawdown of -68.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHD and BMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHD	BMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.52%	-68.22%	+16.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.68%	-42.92%	+17.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.72%	-42.92%	+11.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.72%	-42.92%	+11.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.91%	-38.89%	+21.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.99%	-18.88%	+6.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.20%	26.96%	-10.76%

Volatility

CHD vs. BMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) is 4.81%, while Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) has a volatility of 9.28%. This indicates that CHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHD	BMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.81%	9.28%	-4.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.77%	26.38%	-10.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.55%	38.65%	-16.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.35%	31.77%	-11.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.67%	32.72%	-11.05%

Financials

CHD vs. BMI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and Badger Meter, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CHD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 753.80M and revenue of 1.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.9%.

BMI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported a gross profit of 92.99M and revenue of 220.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.1%.

CHD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported an operating income of 266.00M and revenue of 1.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.

BMI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported an operating income of 43.05M and revenue of 220.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.

CHD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported a net income of 143.50M and revenue of 1.64B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.

BMI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported a net income of 33.58M and revenue of 220.71M, resulting in a net margin of 15.2%.