GINN vs. GVIP
GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) and GVIP (Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GINN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index, while GVIP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GINN returned 6.82%/yr vs 12.90%/yr for GVIP. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GINN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GVIP.
Performance
GINN vs. GVIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GINN achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly lower than GVIP's 16.17% return.
GINN
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 8.64%
- 6M
- 7.90%
- 1Y
- 25.65%
- 3Y*
- 19.95%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- —
GVIP
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 6.71%
- YTD
- 16.17%
- 6M
- 18.08%
- 1Y
- 36.94%
- 3Y*
- 30.49%
- 5Y*
- 12.90%
- 10Y*
- —
GINN vs. GVIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF | 8.64% | 20.25% | 18.71% | 29.94% | -32.40% | 10.39% | 9.84% |
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | 16.17% | 25.27% | 29.82% | 39.15% | -31.95% | 11.86% | 10.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between GINN and GVIP is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2020 | 0.90 |
The correlation between GINN and GVIP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
GINN vs. GVIP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GINN
GVIP
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
GINN
GVIP
Healthcare
GINN
GVIP
Consumer Cyclical
GINN
GVIP
Financial Services
GINN
GVIP
Communication Services
GINN
GVIP
Industrials
GINN
GVIP
Consumer Defensive
GINN
GVIP
Utilities
GINN
GVIP
Energy
GINN
GVIP
-
Real Estate
GINN
GVIP
-
Basic Materials
GINN
GVIP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GINN vs. GVIP — Risk / Return Rank
GINN
GVIP
GINN vs. GVIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GINN | GVIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.36 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 2.71 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.06 | 11.81 | -4.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GINN | GVIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 2.05 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.61 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.82 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
GINN vs. GVIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GINN drawdown since its inception was -41.25%, which is greater than GVIP's maximum drawdown of -37.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GINN and GVIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GINN | GVIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.25% | -37.09% | -4.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.18% | -13.67% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.25% | -23.29% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.25% | -37.09% | -4.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -0.33% | -1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.37% | -7.59% | -5.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 3.14% | +0.50% |
Volatility
GINN vs. GVIP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) is 3.98%, while Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that GINN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GVIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GINN | GVIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 5.42% | -1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.04% | 14.47% | -2.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.06% | 18.13% | -2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 21.29% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.05% | 21.65% | -0.60% |
GINN vs. GVIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GINN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GVIP's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
GINN vs. GVIP - Dividend Comparison
GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than GVIP's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF | 1.16% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.01% | 0.69% | 0.67% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | 0.29% | 0.34% | 0.29% | 0.77% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.77% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GINN and GVIP have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GVIP has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to GINN (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GINN dropped -41.25% vs GVIP's -37.09%.
On 5-year performance, GVIP leads with 12.90% vs 6.82% for GINN. On fees, GVIP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GVIP has performed better with a 12.90% return vs 6.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GVIP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GINN.
GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.29% for GVIP.
GINN is categorized as Technology Equities, while GVIP is Large Cap Growth Equities. GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index, while GVIP tracks Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GINN and 0.45% for GVIP.
GVIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GINN and GVIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer