GINN vs. DRGN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) and DRGN (Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - GINN tracks the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index while DRGN tracks the BITA China Generative AI Select Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GINN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for DRGN.

Performance

GINN vs. DRGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GINN achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly lower than DRGN's 16.07% return.

GINN

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 8.64%
• 6M: 7.90%
• 1Y: 25.65%
• 3Y*: 19.95%
• 5Y*: 6.82%
• 10Y*: —

DRGN

• 1D: 3.59%
• 1M: 4.57%
• YTD: 16.07%
• 6M: 17.38%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GINN vs. DRGN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	8.64%	9.66%
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF	16.07%	26.41%

Correlation

The correlation between GINN and DRGN is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025	0.47

Return for Risk

GINN vs. DRGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GINN

GINN Risk / Return Rank: 44
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 43
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GINN vs. DRGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GINN	DRGN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.95	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.06	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GINN	DRGN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	1.56	-1.11

Drawdowns

GINN vs. DRGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GINN drawdown since its inception was -41.25%, which is greater than DRGN's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GINN and DRGN.

Drawdown Indicators

	GINN	DRGN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.25%	-20.86%	-20.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.63%	-7.44%	+5.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.37%	-7.94%	-5.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.64%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GINN	DRGN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.98%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.04%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.06%	34.93%	-18.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.33%	34.93%	-13.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.05%	34.93%	-13.88%

GINN vs. DRGN - Expense Ratio Comparison

GINN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DRGN's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

GINN vs. DRGN - Dividend Comparison

GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than DRGN's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF	1.05%	1.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	1.16%	1.26%	1.26%	1.01%	0.69%	0.67%	0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GINN and DRGN in my portfolio?

GINN and DRGN have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GINN or DRGN?

On fees, DRGN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GINN or DRGN?

DRGN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GINN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GINN or DRGN?

GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 1.05% for DRGN.

What is the main difference between GINN and DRGN?

GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index, while DRGN tracks BITA China Generative AI Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GINN and 0.39% for DRGN.