GILT vs. NUKZ
GILT (Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd) is a stock, while NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. Over the past year, GILT returned 138.10% vs 27.91% for NUKZ. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GILT vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GILT achieves a 15.92% return, which is significantly higher than NUKZ's 7.57% return.
GILT
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- -4.15%
- YTD
- 15.92%
- 6M
- 18.30%
- 1Y
- 138.10%
- 3Y*
- 37.66%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 14.56%
NUKZ
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 4.81%
- 1Y
- 27.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GILT vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GILT Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd | 15.92% | 110.41% | -0.32% |
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 7.57% | 56.57% | 60.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between GILT and NUKZ is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024 | 0.42 |
The correlation between GILT and NUKZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GILT vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank
GILT
NUKZ
GILT vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GILT | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.17 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 1.70 | +2.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.96 | 4.11 | +5.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GILT vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GILT drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than NUKZ's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILT and NUKZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GILT | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.94% | -33.03% | -66.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.96% | -16.51% | -18.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.47% | -10.39% | -89.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -80.78% | -6.06% | -74.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.93% | 6.80% | +7.13% |
Volatility
GILT vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT) has a higher volatility of 25.22% compared to Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) at 11.24%. This indicates that GILT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GILT | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.22% | 11.24% | +13.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.23% | 23.34% | +36.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.60% | 30.46% | +41.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.93% | 32.94% | +15.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.79% | 32.94% | +14.85% |
Dividends
GILT vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison
GILT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILT Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.91% | 5.52% | 5.71% |
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.85% | 0.91% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GILT and NUKZ have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GILT has higher volatility (25.22%) compared to NUKZ (11.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GILT dropped -99.94% vs NUKZ's -33.03%.
GILT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GILT and NUKZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer