PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GILT vs. INTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GILT vs. INTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT) and Intel Corporation (INTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GILT achieves a 25.50% return, which is significantly lower than INTC's 192.49% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GILT having a 14.95% annualized return and INTC not far ahead at 15.55%.


GILT

1D
0.50%
1M
-12.12%
YTD
25.50%
6M
37.16%
1Y
188.45%
3Y*
46.26%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
14.95%

INTC

1D
-1.28%
1M
8.34%
YTD
192.49%
6M
148.29%
1Y
446.76%
3Y*
52.08%
5Y*
15.96%
10Y*
15.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GILT vs. INTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GILT
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd
25.50%110.41%0.65%5.34%-17.96%18.14%-12.01%-9.43%18.35%54.49%
INTC
Intel Corporation
192.49%84.04%-59.57%94.56%-46.64%6.05%-14.69%30.71%4.23%30.87%

Correlation

The correlation between GILT and INTC is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 1993

0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GILT:

$1.25B

INTC:

$548.61B

EPS

GILT:

$0.49

INTC:

-$0.67

PS Ratio

GILT:

2.26

INTC:

9.45

PB Ratio

GILT:

2.34

INTC:

4.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

GILT:

$470.09M

INTC:

$53.76B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GILT:

$142.60M

INTC:

$19.05B

EBITDA (TTM)

GILT:

$56.44M

INTC:

$8.83B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GILT vs. INTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GILT
GILT Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
GILT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GILT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GILT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GILT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
GILT Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

INTC
INTC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
INTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTC Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
INTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTC Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GILT vs. INTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT) and Intel Corporation (INTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GILTINTCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.71

6.27

-3.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.91

5.19

-2.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.65

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.69

18.70

-13.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.84

45.21

-30.37

GILT vs. INTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GILT Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is lower than the INTC Sharpe Ratio of 6.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GILT and INTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GILTINTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

6.27

-3.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.31

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.36

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.14

0.36

-0.50

Drawdowns

GILT vs. INTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GILT drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than INTC's maximum drawdown of -82.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILT and INTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GILTINTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.94%

-82.25%

-17.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.65%

-24.17%

-9.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.94%

-63.80%

+21.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.20%

-65.95%

+2.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.89%

-70.80%

-10.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.42%

-16.62%

-82.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-80.77%

-36.68%

-44.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.91%

10.00%

+2.91%

Volatility

GILT vs. INTC - Volatility Comparison

Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT) has a higher volatility of 33.24% compared to Intel Corporation (INTC) at 25.06%. This indicates that GILT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GILTINTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.24%

25.06%

+8.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.80%

56.44%

+1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.90%

71.80%

-1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.32%

51.55%

-3.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.47%

43.76%

+3.71%

Dividends

GILT vs. INTC - Dividend Comparison

Neither GILT nor INTC has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GILT
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%8.91%5.52%5.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INTC
Intel Corporation
0.00%0.00%1.87%1.47%5.52%2.70%2.65%2.11%2.56%2.33%2.87%2.79%

Financials

GILT vs. INTC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd and Intel Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
110.47M
13.58B
(GILT) Total Revenue
(INTC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GILT vs. INTC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd and Intel Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
34.1%
39.4%
Portfolio components
GILT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd reported a gross profit of 37.65M and revenue of 110.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.1%.

INTC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intel Corporation reported a gross profit of 5.35B and revenue of 13.58B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.

GILT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd reported an operating income of 5.43M and revenue of 110.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

INTC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intel Corporation reported an operating income of -3.14B and revenue of 13.58B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.1%.

GILT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd reported a net income of 5.23M and revenue of 110.47M, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.

INTC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intel Corporation reported a net income of -3.73B and revenue of 13.58B, resulting in a net margin of -27.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GILT and INTC have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GILT has higher volatility (33.24%) compared to INTC (25.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GILT dropped -99.94% vs INTC's -82.25%.

INTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.27 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GILT and INTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer