PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GILT vs. WMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GILT vs. WMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GILT achieves a -14.61% return, which is significantly lower than WMT's 0.21% return. Over the past 10 years, GILT has underperformed WMT with an annualized return of 12.03%, while WMT has yielded a comparatively higher 18.40% annualized return.


GILT

1D
0.45%
1M
-14.21%
6M
-42.72%
YTD
-14.61%
1Y
50.34%
3Y*
20.41%
5Y*
1.06%
10Y*
12.03%
ALL TIME*
-8.54%

WMT

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.57%
6M
-6.30%
YTD
0.21%
1Y
13.85%
3Y*
29.39%
5Y*
20.06%
10Y*
18.40%
ALL TIME*
18.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.15M$5.99M$13.05M
$2.47B$2.41B$2.70B

GILT vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GILT
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd
-14.61%110.41%0.65%5.34%-17.96%18.14%-12.01%-9.43%18.35%54.49%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
0.21%24.49%73.99%12.88%-0.46%1.97%23.32%30.16%-3.43%46.56%

Correlation

The correlation between GILT and WMT is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1993

0.12

The correlation between GILT and WMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GILT:

$833.95M

WMT:

$884.94B

EPS

GILT:

$0.47

WMT:

$2.88

PE Ratio

GILT:

23.56

WMT:

38.61

PS Ratio

GILT:

1.60

WMT:

1.23

PB Ratio

GILT:

1.59

WMT:

9.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

GILT:

$470.09M

WMT:

$725.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GILT:

$142.60M

WMT:

$181.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

GILT:

$56.44M

WMT:

$44.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GILT vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GILT
GILT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
GILT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GILT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
GILT Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
GILT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GILT Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

WMT
WMT Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
WMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMT Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
WMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GILT vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GILTWMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.12

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

0.75

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.31

1.96

+0.35

GILT vs. WMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GILT Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is comparable to the WMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GILT and WMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GILT vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GILT drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than WMT's maximum drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILT and WMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GILTWMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.94%

-77.14%

-22.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.83%

-19.23%

-30.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.83%

-21.93%

-27.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.49%

-25.74%

-35.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.89%

-25.74%

-55.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.61%

-17.14%

-82.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-80.86%

-14.63%

-66.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.70%

7.39%

+13.31%

Volatility

GILT vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison

Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT) has a higher volatility of 15.86% compared to Walmart Inc. (WMT) at 6.81%. This indicates that GILT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GILTWMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.86%

6.81%

+9.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.86%

19.61%

+40.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.50%

24.77%

+48.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.32%

21.96%

+27.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.14%

21.90%

+26.24%

Dividends

GILT vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison

GILT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GILT
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%8.91%5.52%5.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
0.87%0.84%0.92%1.45%1.58%1.52%1.50%1.78%2.23%2.07%2.89%3.20%

Financials

GILT vs. WMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd and Walmart Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

GILT vs. WMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd and Walmart Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

GILT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd reported a gross profit of 37.65M and revenue of 110.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.1%.

WMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.69B and revenue of 177.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

GILT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd reported an operating income of 5.43M and revenue of 110.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

WMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Walmart Inc. reported an operating income of 7.49B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

GILT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd reported a net income of 5.23M and revenue of 110.47M, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.

WMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GILT and WMT have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GILT has higher volatility (15.86%) compared to WMT (6.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GILT dropped -99.94% vs WMT's -77.14%.

GILT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GILT and WMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer