PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GILT vs. FTV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GILT and FTV is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

GILT vs. FTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT) and Fortive Corporation (FTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
45.18%
16.08%
GILT
FTV

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GILT:

0.11

FTV:

-0.09

Sortino Ratio

GILT:

0.45

FTV:

0.02

Omega Ratio

GILT:

1.06

FTV:

1.00

Calmar Ratio

GILT:

0.04

FTV:

-0.09

Martin Ratio

GILT:

0.21

FTV:

-0.16

Ulcer Index

GILT:

20.27%

FTV:

11.82%

Daily Std Dev

GILT:

40.16%

FTV:

20.81%

Max Drawdown

GILT:

-99.94%

FTV:

-52.65%

Current Drawdown

GILT:

-99.76%

FTV:

-6.30%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GILT:

$386.58M

FTV:

$27.87B

EPS

GILT:

$0.44

FTV:

$2.33

PE Ratio

GILT:

15.41

FTV:

34.59

PEG Ratio

GILT:

0.00

FTV:

1.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

GILT:

$227.32M

FTV:

$6.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GILT:

$82.31M

FTV:

$3.73B

EBITDA (TTM)

GILT:

$24.74M

FTV:

$1.53B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GILT achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly higher than FTV's 7.47% return.


GILT

YTD

10.24%

1M

2.73%

6M

45.18%

1Y

5.28%

5Y*

-4.45%

10Y*

5.46%

FTV

YTD

7.47%

1M

3.49%

6M

16.08%

1Y

-4.34%

5Y*

4.82%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GILT vs. FTV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GILT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GILT is 4646
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GILT is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GILT is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GILT is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GILT is 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GILT is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

FTV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FTV is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FTV is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FTV is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FTV is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FTV is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FTV is 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GILT vs. FTV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT) and Fortive Corporation (FTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GILT, currently valued at 0.11, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.11-0.09
The chart of Sortino ratio for GILT, currently valued at 0.45, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.450.02
The chart of Omega ratio for GILT, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.061.00
The chart of Calmar ratio for GILT, currently valued at 0.05, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.05-0.09
The chart of Martin ratio for GILT, currently valued at 0.21, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.21-0.16
GILT
FTV

The current GILT Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is higher than the FTV Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GILT and FTV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.11
-0.09
GILT
FTV

Dividends

GILT vs. FTV - Dividend Comparison

GILT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%.


TTM202420232022202120202019201820172016
GILT
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%8.91%5.52%5.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTV
Fortive Corporation
0.40%0.43%0.39%0.44%0.37%0.35%0.37%0.41%0.39%0.26%

Drawdowns

GILT vs. FTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GILT drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than FTV's maximum drawdown of -52.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILT and FTV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-68.17%
-6.30%
GILT
FTV

Volatility

GILT vs. FTV - Volatility Comparison

Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT) has a higher volatility of 13.17% compared to Fortive Corporation (FTV) at 4.75%. This indicates that GILT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
13.17%
4.75%
GILT
FTV

Financials

GILT vs. FTV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd and Fortive Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab