GILT vs. FTV
GILT (Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd) and FTV (Fortive Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — GILT in Communication Equipment, FTV in Scientific & Technical Instruments. Over the past 5 years, GILT returned 9.51%/yr vs 2.09%/yr for FTV. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GILT vs. FTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GILT achieves a 25.50% return, which is significantly higher than FTV's 9.09% return.
GILT
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -12.12%
- YTD
- 25.50%
- 6M
- 37.16%
- 1Y
- 188.45%
- 3Y*
- 46.26%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 14.95%
FTV
- 1D
- 2.45%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- YTD
- 9.09%
- 6M
- 13.33%
- 1Y
- 14.13%
- 3Y*
- 6.33%
- 5Y*
- 2.09%
- 10Y*
- —
GILT vs. FTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILT Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd | 25.50% | 110.41% | 0.65% | 5.34% | -17.96% | 18.14% | -12.01% | -9.43% | 18.35% | 54.49% |
FTV Fortive Corporation | 9.09% | -1.77% | 2.28% | 15.08% | -15.41% | 8.14% | 11.23% | 13.33% | -6.14% | 35.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between GILT and FTV is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2016 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
GILT:
$1.25B
FTV:
$18.82B
GILT:
$0.49
FTV:
$1.66
GILT:
33.26
FTV:
36.16
GILT:
2.26
FTV:
4.15
GILT:
2.34
FTV:
3.09
GILT:
$470.09M
FTV:
$4.74B
GILT:
$142.60M
FTV:
$2.93B
GILT:
$56.44M
FTV:
$1.11B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GILT vs. FTV — Risk / Return Rank
GILT
FTV
GILT vs. FTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT) and Fortive Corporation (FTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GILT | FTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.71 | 0.55 | +2.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.91 | 1.01 | +1.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.12 | +0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.69 | 0.91 | +4.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.84 | 1.82 | +13.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GILT | FTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 0.55 | +2.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.08 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.14 | 0.28 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
GILT vs. FTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GILT drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than FTV's maximum drawdown of -52.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILT and FTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GILT | FTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.94% | -52.65% | -47.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.65% | -15.62% | -18.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.94% | -28.03% | -13.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.20% | -32.10% | -31.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.42% | -6.57% | -92.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -80.77% | -11.34% | -69.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.91% | 7.83% | +5.08% |
Volatility
GILT vs. FTV - Volatility Comparison
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT) has a higher volatility of 33.24% compared to Fortive Corporation (FTV) at 5.32%. This indicates that GILT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GILT | FTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.24% | 5.32% | +27.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.80% | 20.39% | +37.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.90% | 25.73% | +44.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.32% | 25.02% | +23.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.47% | 26.48% | +20.99% |
Dividends
GILT vs. FTV - Dividend Comparison
GILT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTV Fortive Corporation | 0.38% | 0.53% | 0.43% | 0.39% | 0.44% | 0.37% | 0.35% | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.39% | 0.26% |
GILT Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.91% | 5.52% | 5.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GILT vs. FTV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd and Fortive Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GILT vs. FTV - Profitability Comparison
GILT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd reported a gross profit of 37.65M and revenue of 110.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.1%.
FTV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortive Corporation reported a gross profit of 675.50M and revenue of 1.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.2%.
GILT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd reported an operating income of 5.43M and revenue of 110.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.
FTV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortive Corporation reported an operating income of 191.70M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.9%.
GILT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd reported a net income of 5.23M and revenue of 110.47M, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
FTV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortive Corporation reported a net income of 136.40M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GILT and FTV have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GILT has higher volatility (33.24%) compared to FTV (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GILT dropped -99.94% vs FTV's -52.65%.
GILT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GILT and FTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer