PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIFIX vs. GIBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIFIX vs. GIBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund (GIFIX) and Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund (GIBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIFIX achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly higher than GIBIX's 0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, GIFIX has outperformed GIBIX with an annualized return of 4.30%, while GIBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.85% annualized return.


GIFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.64%
YTD
1.13%
6M
1.69%
1Y
3.28%
3Y*
6.90%
5Y*
4.98%
10Y*
4.30%

GIBIX

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.09%
YTD
0.59%
6M
0.70%
1Y
6.21%
3Y*
5.35%
5Y*
0.56%
10Y*
2.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIFIX vs. GIBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GIFIX
Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund
1.13%4.13%7.22%13.03%-2.05%4.55%1.36%6.69%-0.14%3.63%
GIBIX
Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund
0.59%8.22%3.18%7.45%-16.38%-0.58%14.94%4.45%0.89%6.50%

Correlation

The correlation between GIFIX and GIBIX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIFIX vs. GIBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIFIX
GIFIX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
GIFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GIFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

GIBIX
GIBIX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
GIBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
GIBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIFIX vs. GIBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund (GIFIX) and Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund (GIBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GIFIXGIBIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

1.50

-0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.25

2.27

+0.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.27

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

2.30

+0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.38

7.25

+1.13

GIFIX vs. GIBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the GIBIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIFIX and GIBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GIFIXGIBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.50

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.85

0.10

+1.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.29

0.60

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.62

0.92

+0.69

Drawdowns

GIFIX vs. GIBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIFIX drawdown since its inception was -19.03%, smaller than the maximum GIBIX drawdown of -21.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIFIX and GIBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIFIXGIBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.03%

-21.44%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.40%

-2.99%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.49%

-5.93%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.30%

-21.44%

+15.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.03%

-21.44%

+2.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.21%

+1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.75%

-3.42%

+2.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

0.95%

-0.47%

Volatility

GIFIX vs. GIBIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund (GIFIX) is 0.64%, while Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund (GIBIX) has a volatility of 1.45%. This indicates that GIFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIFIXGIBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

1.45%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.71%

2.91%

-1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37%

3.98%

-1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.71%

5.83%

-3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.36%

4.77%

-1.41%

GIFIX vs. GIBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIFIX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than GIBIX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GIFIX vs. GIBIX - Dividend Comparison

GIFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.01%, more than GIBIX's 5.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIBIX
Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund
5.09%5.03%4.71%4.44%3.08%3.36%4.80%2.38%3.25%3.38%4.68%4.39%
GIFIX
Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund
7.01%7.40%8.47%8.34%3.64%2.91%3.78%4.38%4.71%3.83%4.10%4.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


GIFIX and GIBIX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GIBIX has higher volatility (1.45%) compared to GIFIX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIFIX dropped -19.03% vs GIBIX's -21.44%.

GIBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIFIX and GIBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer