PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIFIX vs. SECEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIFIX vs. SECEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund (GIFIX) and Guggenheim StylePlus - Large Core Fund (SECEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIFIX achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly lower than SECEX's 13.41% return. Over the past 10 years, GIFIX has underperformed SECEX with an annualized return of 4.31%, while SECEX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.69% annualized return.


GIFIX

1D
0.04%
1M
0.64%
YTD
1.08%
6M
1.78%
1Y
3.49%
3Y*
6.53%
5Y*
4.97%
10Y*
4.31%

SECEX

1D
1.50%
1M
2.09%
YTD
13.41%
6M
12.89%
1Y
30.53%
3Y*
21.95%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
14.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIFIX vs. SECEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GIFIX
Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund
1.08%4.13%7.22%13.03%-2.05%4.55%1.36%6.69%-0.14%3.63%
SECEX
Guggenheim StylePlus - Large Core Fund
13.41%16.04%25.74%26.72%-21.98%28.21%17.76%29.62%-7.18%21.99%

Correlation

The correlation between GIFIX and SECEX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIFIX vs. SECEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIFIX
GIFIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
GIFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
GIFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SECEX
SECEX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SECEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SECEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SECEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SECEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SECEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIFIX vs. SECEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund (GIFIX) and Guggenheim StylePlus - Large Core Fund (SECEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GIFIXSECEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.41

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

2.98

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.40

12.95

-5.55

GIFIX vs. SECEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the SECEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIFIX and SECEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GIFIX vs. SECEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIFIX drawdown since its inception was -19.03%, smaller than the maximum SECEX drawdown of -73.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIFIX and SECEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIFIXSECEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.03%

-73.88%

+54.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.40%

-10.23%

+8.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.49%

-18.34%

+15.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.30%

-27.55%

+21.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.03%

-35.59%

+16.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-1.20%

+1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.75%

-20.65%

+19.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

2.35%

-1.88%

Volatility

GIFIX vs. SECEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund (GIFIX) is 0.64%, while Guggenheim StylePlus - Large Core Fund (SECEX) has a volatility of 6.35%. This indicates that GIFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SECEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIFIXSECEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

6.35%

-5.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.63%

11.04%

-9.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37%

13.35%

-10.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.71%

17.20%

-14.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.36%

18.19%

-14.83%

GIFIX vs. SECEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIFIX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than SECEX's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

GIFIX vs. SECEX - Dividend Comparison

GIFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.01%, more than SECEX's 2.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIFIX
Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund
7.01%7.40%8.47%8.34%3.64%2.91%3.78%4.38%4.71%3.83%4.10%4.85%
SECEX
Guggenheim StylePlus - Large Core Fund
2.60%2.95%23.10%2.50%40.57%4.58%9.21%1.57%22.52%18.80%1.94%12.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


GIFIX and SECEX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SECEX has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to GIFIX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIFIX dropped -19.03% vs SECEX's -73.88%.

SECEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIFIX and SECEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer