GIEQ vs. EFAS
GIEQ (Goldman Sachs Data Enhanced International Equity ETF) and EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GIEQ is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while EFAS is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GIEQ charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for EFAS.
Performance
GIEQ vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GIEQ
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
EFAS
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 3.79%
- 6M
- 16.19%
- YTD
- 17.18%
- 1Y
- 29.52%
- 3Y*
- 23.99%
- 5Y*
- 13.87%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.51%
GIEQ vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GIEQ Goldman Sachs Data Enhanced International Equity ETF | 1.07% |
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 1.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIEQ and EFAS is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2026 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIEQ vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank
GIEQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EFAS
GIEQ vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Data Enhanced International Equity ETF (GIEQ) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIEQ | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.60 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIEQ vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIEQ drawdown since its inception was -3.19%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIEQ and EFAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIEQ | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.19% | -44.38% | +41.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.57% | -0.25% | -2.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.96% | -7.01% | +6.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.16% | — |
Volatility
GIEQ vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIEQ | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.55% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.20% | 10.95% | +4.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.20% | 15.52% | -0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.20% | 18.25% | -3.05% |
GIEQ vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIEQ has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAS's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
GIEQ vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison
GIEQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 4.65% | 4.83% | 6.76% | 6.33% | 7.28% | 5.19% | 4.34% | 5.75% | 6.63% | 6.15% | 0.21% |
GIEQ Goldman Sachs Data Enhanced International Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIEQ and EFAS have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GIEQ is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GIEQ is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EFAS.
EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 0.00% for GIEQ.
GIEQ is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EFAS is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GIEQ and 0.55% for EFAS.
Find the right allocation for GIEQ and EFAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer