GIEQ vs. GHYB
GIEQ (Goldman Sachs Data Enhanced International Equity ETF) and GHYB (Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GIEQ is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while GHYB is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Goldman Sachs High Yield Corporate Bond Index. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GIEQ charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for GHYB.
Performance
GIEQ vs. GHYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GIEQ
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GHYB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 5.75%
- 3Y*
- 8.51%
- 5Y*
- 3.89%
- 10Y*
- —
GIEQ vs. GHYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GIEQ Goldman Sachs Data Enhanced International Equity ETF | 2.40% |
GHYB Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIEQ and GHYB is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2026 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIEQ vs. GHYB — Risk / Return Rank
GIEQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GHYB
GIEQ vs. GHYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Data Enhanced International Equity ETF (GIEQ) and Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIEQ | GHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.16 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIEQ vs. GHYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIEQ drawdown since its inception was -3.19%, smaller than the maximum GHYB drawdown of -21.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIEQ and GHYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIEQ | GHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.19% | -21.48% | +18.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | 0.00% | -0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -2.55% | +1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.59% | — |
Volatility
GIEQ vs. GHYB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIEQ | GHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.91% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.02% | 3.50% | +12.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 7.70% | +8.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 8.25% | +7.77% |
GIEQ vs. GHYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIEQ has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than GHYB's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
GIEQ vs. GHYB - Dividend Comparison
GIEQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.78%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHYB Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.78% | 7.00% | 6.65% | 6.20% | 5.67% | 4.46% | 4.75% | 5.57% | 5.68% | 1.45% |
GIEQ Goldman Sachs Data Enhanced International Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIEQ and GHYB have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GIEQ is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GIEQ is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for GHYB.
GHYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.78%, compared with 0.00% for GIEQ.
GIEQ is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while GHYB is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GIEQ and 0.34% for GHYB.
Find the right allocation for GIEQ and GHYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer