GIB vs. RGA
GIB (CGI Inc) and RGA (Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated) are both stocks. GIB operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while RGA operates in Insurance - Reinsurance (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, GIB returned 4.25%/yr vs 11.32%/yr for RGA. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GIB vs. RGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIB achieves a -20.45% return, which is significantly lower than RGA's 17.66% return. Over the past 10 years, GIB has underperformed RGA with an annualized return of 4.25%, while RGA has yielded a comparatively higher 11.32% annualized return.
GIB
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 11.73%
- 6M
- -14.41%
- YTD
- -20.45%
- 1Y
- -23.67%
- 3Y*
- -9.95%
- 5Y*
- -4.08%
- 10Y*
- 4.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.36%
RGA
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 9.83%
- 6M
- 18.07%
- YTD
- 17.66%
- 1Y
- 25.63%
- 3Y*
- 21.10%
- 5Y*
- 19.04%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
GIB CGI Inc | $41.80M | $36.08M | $33.67M |
| $80.43M | $84.29M | $82.13M |
GIB vs. RGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIB CGI Inc | -20.45% | -15.19% | 2.07% | 24.47% | -2.68% | 11.59% | -5.26% | 36.80% | 12.63% | 13.12% |
RGA Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated | 17.66% | -2.97% | 34.38% | 16.39% | 33.04% | -3.21% | -27.02% | 18.29% | -8.71% | 25.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIB and RGA is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2008 | 0.34 |
Fundamentals
GIB:
$15.64B
RGA:
$15.52B
GIB:
CA$7.71
RGA:
$20.15
GIB:
13.29
RGA:
11.76
GIB:
1.67
RGA:
0.45
GIB:
1.36
RGA:
0.58
GIB:
CA$16.35B
RGA:
$18.13B
GIB:
CA$3.35B
RGA:
$3.15B
GIB:
CA$2.98B
RGA:
$1.46B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIB vs. RGA — Risk / Return Rank
GIB
RGA
GIB vs. RGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CGI Inc (GIB) and Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (RGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIB | RGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.21 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.65 | 2.03 | -2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.16 | 5.07 | -6.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIB vs. RGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIB drawdown since its inception was -86.78%, which is greater than RGA's maximum drawdown of -65.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIB and RGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIB | RGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.78% | -65.75% | -21.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.77% | -12.68% | -24.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.54% | -27.11% | -22.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.54% | -27.11% | -22.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.54% | -65.75% | +16.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.76% | -2.39% | -37.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.55% | -11.61% | -20.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.44% | 5.16% | +15.28% |
Volatility
GIB vs. RGA - Volatility Comparison
CGI Inc (GIB) has a higher volatility of 10.64% compared to Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (RGA) at 7.02%. This indicates that GIB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIB | RGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.64% | 7.02% | +3.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.97% | 17.74% | +9.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.79% | 23.88% | +6.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.49% | 27.55% | -4.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.76% | 32.92% | -10.16% |
Dividends
GIB vs. RGA - Dividend Comparison
GIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than RGA's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIB CGI Inc | 0.65% | 0.48% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RGA Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated | 1.76% | 1.79% | 1.63% | 2.04% | 2.15% | 2.61% | 2.42% | 1.59% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.24% | 1.64% |
Financials
GIB vs. RGA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CGI Inc and Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GIB vs. RGA - Profitability Comparison
GIB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CGI Inc reported a gross profit of 684.28M and revenue of 4.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.4%.
RGA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GIB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CGI Inc reported an operating income of 684.28M and revenue of 4.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.4%.
RGA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported an operating income of 441.00K and revenue of 6.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.
GIB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CGI Inc reported a net income of 445.87M and revenue of 4.17B, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.
RGA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported a net income of 331.00K and revenue of 6.49M, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GIB and RGA have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIB has higher volatility (10.64%) compared to RGA (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIB dropped -86.78% vs RGA's -65.75%.
RGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIB and RGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer