GIB vs. CACI

In the year-to-date period, GIB achieves a 7.32% return, which is significantly higher than CACI's -15.44% return. Over the past 10 years, GIB has underperformed CACI with an annualized return of 10.31%, while CACI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.44% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CGI Inc (GIB) and CACI International Inc (CACI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GIB Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is higher than the CACI Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIB and CACI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither GIB nor CACI has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum GIB drawdown since its inception was -86.78%, roughly equal to the maximum CACI drawdown of -90.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIB and CACI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for CGI Inc (GIB) is 5.69%, while CACI International Inc (CACI) has a volatility of 13.84%. This indicates that GIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CACI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CGI Inc and CACI International Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.