PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIB vs. IBM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

GIB vs. IBM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CGI Inc (GIB) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GIB vs. IBM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GIB
CGI Inc
-20.67%-15.19%2.07%24.47%-2.68%11.59%-5.26%36.80%12.63%13.12%
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
-17.70%38.23%39.27%21.85%10.64%16.65%-1.16%23.58%-22.56%-3.99%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GIB:

$15.91B

IBM:

$230.85B

EPS

GIB:

$7.51

IBM:

$11.16

PE Ratio

GIB:

9.74

IBM:

21.72

PEG Ratio

GIB:

1.22

IBM:

0.26

PS Ratio

GIB:

1.00

IBM:

3.41

PB Ratio

GIB:

1.60

IBM:

7.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

GIB:

$16.20B

IBM:

$67.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GIB:

$3.33B

IBM:

$39.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

GIB:

$2.89B

IBM:

$16.95B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIB achieves a -20.67% return, which is significantly lower than IBM's -17.70% return. Over the past 10 years, GIB has underperformed IBM with an annualized return of 4.37%, while IBM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.73% annualized return.


GIB

1D
0.72%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
-20.67%
6M
-17.73%
1Y
-26.39%
3Y*
-8.55%
5Y*
-2.64%
10Y*
4.37%

IBM

1D
2.17%
1M
0.91%
YTD
-17.70%
6M
-13.13%
1Y
-0.10%
3Y*
27.02%
5Y*
18.36%
10Y*
9.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIB vs. IBM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIB
GIB Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
GIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIB Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
GIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIB Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

IBM
IBM Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IBM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBM Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IBM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBM Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIB vs. IBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CGI Inc (GIB) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GIBIBMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.07

-0.00

-1.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.40

0.22

-1.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.03

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

0.06

-0.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.41

0.17

-1.59

GIB vs. IBM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIB Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is lower than the IBM Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIB and IBM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GIBIBMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.07

-0.00

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

0.74

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

0.38

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.29

-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between GIB and IBM is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GIB vs. IBM - Dividend Comparison

GIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than IBM's 2.77% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIB
CGI Inc
0.63%0.48%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
2.77%2.27%3.03%4.05%4.68%4.74%5.17%4.80%5.46%3.85%3.31%3.63%

Drawdowns

GIB vs. IBM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIB drawdown since its inception was -86.78%, which is greater than IBM's maximum drawdown of -69.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIB and IBM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GIBIBMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.78%

-69.40%

-17.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.30%

-28.69%

-6.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.98%

-28.69%

-13.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.98%

-40.59%

-5.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.93%

-22.61%

-17.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.42%

-20.11%

-12.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.78%

10.44%

+7.34%

Volatility

GIB vs. IBM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CGI Inc (GIB) is 6.88%, while International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) has a volatility of 8.93%. This indicates that GIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GIBIBMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.88%

8.93%

-2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.97%

27.13%

-7.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.77%

33.70%

-8.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.70%

24.97%

-3.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.16%

25.49%

-3.33%

Financials

GIB vs. IBM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CGI Inc and International Business Machines Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
4.08B
19.69B
(GIB) Total Revenue
(IBM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GIB vs. IBM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CGI Inc and International Business Machines Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
16.0%
60.6%
Portfolio components
GIB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CGI Inc reported a gross profit of 652.69M and revenue of 4.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.0%.

IBM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a gross profit of 11.93B and revenue of 19.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.

GIB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CGI Inc reported an operating income of 652.69M and revenue of 4.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.0%.

IBM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported an operating income of 3.06B and revenue of 19.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.5%.

GIB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CGI Inc reported a net income of 441.64M and revenue of 4.08B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.

IBM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a net income of 5.60B and revenue of 19.69B, resulting in a net margin of 28.5%.