GIB vs. ACN

In the year-to-date period, GIB achieves a 9.78% return, which is significantly lower than ACN's 10.64% return. Over the past 10 years, GIB has underperformed ACN with an annualized return of 11.21%, while ACN has yielded a comparatively higher 17.69% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CGI Inc (GIB) and Accenture plc (ACN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GIB Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is comparable to the ACN Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIB and ACN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

GIB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.

The maximum GIB drawdown since its inception was -86.78%, which is greater than ACN's maximum drawdown of -59.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIB and ACN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

CGI Inc (GIB) and Accenture plc (ACN) have volatilities of 5.49% and 5.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CGI Inc and Accenture plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.