GIB vs. HL
GIB (CGI Inc) and HL (Hecla Mining Company) are both stocks. GIB operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while HL operates in Other Precious Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, GIB returned 4.42%/yr vs 10.98%/yr for HL. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GIB vs. HL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIB achieves a -27.08% return, which is significantly lower than HL's -17.53% return. Over the past 10 years, GIB has underperformed HL with an annualized return of 4.42%, while HL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.98% annualized return.
GIB
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- 6M
- -28.26%
- YTD
- -27.08%
- 1Y
- -32.90%
- 3Y*
- -13.48%
- 5Y*
- -5.94%
- 10Y*
- 4.42%
HL
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- 6M
- -29.50%
- YTD
- -17.53%
- 1Y
- 150.61%
- 3Y*
- 44.14%
- 5Y*
- 17.81%
- 10Y*
- 10.98%
GIB vs. HL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIB CGI Inc | -27.08% | -15.19% | 2.07% | 24.47% | -2.68% | 11.59% | -5.26% | 36.80% | 12.63% | 13.12% |
HL Hecla Mining Company | -17.53% | 291.70% | 2.82% | -12.93% | 6.99% | -18.97% | 91.83% | 44.43% | -40.37% | -24.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIB and HL is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 1998 | 0.16 |
The correlation between GIB and HL shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GIB:
$14.57B
HL:
$10.61B
GIB:
CA$7.71
HL:
$0.83
GIB:
12.31
HL:
19.05
GIB:
1.54
HL:
0.08
GIB:
1.26
HL:
6.77
GIB:
2.02
HL:
4.15
GIB:
CA$16.35B
HL:
$1.57B
GIB:
CA$3.35B
HL:
$788.95M
GIB:
CA$2.98B
HL:
$864.40M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIB vs. HL — Risk / Return Rank
GIB
HL
GIB vs. HL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CGI Inc (GIB) and Hecla Mining Company (HL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIB | HL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.33 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 3.05 | -3.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | 6.03 | -7.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIB vs. HL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIB drawdown since its inception was -86.78%, smaller than the maximum HL drawdown of -97.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIB and HL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIB | HL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.78% | -97.92% | +11.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.72% | -55.81% | +16.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.54% | -55.81% | +6.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.54% | -55.81% | +6.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.54% | -82.45% | +32.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.78% | -50.25% | +5.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.53% | -69.90% | +37.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.14% | 28.11% | -5.97% |
Volatility
GIB vs. HL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CGI Inc (GIB) is 9.99%, while Hecla Mining Company (HL) has a volatility of 17.79%. This indicates that GIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIB | HL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.99% | 17.79% | -7.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.79% | 53.33% | -27.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.27% | 73.28% | -44.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.12% | 59.43% | -36.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.68% | 62.82% | -40.14% |
Dividends
GIB vs. HL - Dividend Comparison
GIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than HL's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIB CGI Inc | 0.71% | 0.48% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HL Hecla Mining Company | 0.09% | 0.08% | 0.81% | 0.65% | 0.40% | 0.72% | 0.25% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.25% | 0.19% | 0.53% |
Financials
GIB vs. HL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CGI Inc and Hecla Mining Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GIB vs. HL - Profitability Comparison
GIB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CGI Inc reported a gross profit of 684.28M and revenue of 4.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.4%.
HL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a gross profit of 253.26M and revenue of 411.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.
GIB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CGI Inc reported an operating income of 684.28M and revenue of 4.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.4%.
HL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported an operating income of 223.11M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.2%.
GIB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CGI Inc reported a net income of 445.87M and revenue of 4.17B, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.
HL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a net income of 266.45M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in a net margin of 64.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GIB and HL have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HL has higher volatility (17.79%) compared to GIB (9.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIB dropped -86.78% vs HL's -97.92%.
HL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIB and HL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer