GIB vs. EZPW
GIB (CGI Inc) and EZPW (EZCORP, Inc.) are both stocks. GIB operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while EZPW operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, GIB returned 4.25%/yr vs 12.60%/yr for EZPW. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GIB vs. EZPW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIB achieves a -20.45% return, which is significantly lower than EZPW's 53.30% return. Over the past 10 years, GIB has underperformed EZPW with an annualized return of 4.25%, while EZPW has yielded a comparatively higher 12.60% annualized return.
GIB
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 11.73%
- 6M
- -14.41%
- YTD
- -20.45%
- 1Y
- -23.67%
- 3Y*
- -9.95%
- 5Y*
- -4.08%
- 10Y*
- 4.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.36%
EZPW
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- -16.21%
- 6M
- 38.79%
- YTD
- 53.30%
- 1Y
- 107.89%
- 3Y*
- 48.72%
- 5Y*
- 39.08%
- 10Y*
- 12.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
EZPW EZCORP, Inc. | $23.79M | $29.04M | $30.38M |
GIB CGI Inc | $41.80M | $36.08M | $33.67M |
GIB vs. EZPW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIB CGI Inc | -20.45% | -15.19% | 2.07% | 24.47% | -2.68% | 11.59% | -5.26% | 36.80% | 12.63% | 13.12% |
EZPW EZCORP, Inc. | 53.30% | 58.92% | 39.82% | 7.24% | 10.58% | 53.86% | -29.77% | -11.77% | -36.64% | 14.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIB and EZPW is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 1998 | 0.16 |
The correlation between GIB and EZPW shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GIB:
$15.64B
EZPW:
$1.74B
GIB:
CA$7.71
EZPW:
$1.76
GIB:
13.29
EZPW:
16.91
GIB:
1.67
EZPW:
0.11
GIB:
1.36
EZPW:
1.68
GIB:
2.18
EZPW:
2.22
GIB:
CA$16.35B
EZPW:
$1.48B
GIB:
CA$3.35B
EZPW:
$865.21M
GIB:
CA$2.98B
EZPW:
$256.16M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIB vs. EZPW — Risk / Return Rank
GIB
EZPW
GIB vs. EZPW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CGI Inc (GIB) and EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIB | EZPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.45 | -0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.65 | 5.91 | -6.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.16 | 19.70 | -20.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIB vs. EZPW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIB drawdown since its inception was -86.78%, smaller than the maximum EZPW drawdown of -97.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIB and EZPW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIB | EZPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.78% | -97.28% | +10.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.77% | -18.35% | -18.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.54% | -20.51% | -29.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.54% | -35.94% | -13.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.54% | -76.59% | +27.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.76% | -21.80% | -17.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.55% | -58.93% | +26.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.44% | 5.50% | +14.94% |
Volatility
GIB vs. EZPW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CGI Inc (GIB) is 10.64%, while EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW) has a volatility of 15.87%. This indicates that GIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZPW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIB | EZPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.64% | 15.87% | -5.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.97% | 31.30% | -4.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.79% | 38.42% | -7.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.49% | 34.66% | -11.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.76% | 39.06% | -16.30% |
Dividends
GIB vs. EZPW - Dividend Comparison
GIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while EZPW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EZPW EZCORP, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GIB CGI Inc | 0.65% | 0.48% | 0.10% |
Financials
GIB vs. EZPW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CGI Inc and EZCORP, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GIB vs. EZPW - Profitability Comparison
GIB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CGI Inc reported a gross profit of 684.28M and revenue of 4.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.4%.
EZPW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported a gross profit of 260.04M and revenue of 446.88M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.2%.
GIB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CGI Inc reported an operating income of 684.28M and revenue of 4.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.4%.
EZPW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported an operating income of 67.84M and revenue of 446.88M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.
GIB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CGI Inc reported a net income of 445.87M and revenue of 4.17B, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.
EZPW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported a net income of 49.10M and revenue of 446.88M, resulting in a net margin of 11.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GIB and EZPW have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EZPW has higher volatility (15.87%) compared to GIB (10.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIB dropped -86.78% vs EZPW's -97.28%.
EZPW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIB and EZPW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer