GIB vs. AEM
GIB (CGI Inc) and AEM (Agnico Eagle Mines Limited) are both stocks. GIB operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while AEM operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, GIB returned 4.42%/yr vs 12.59%/yr for AEM. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GIB vs. AEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIB achieves a -27.08% return, which is significantly lower than AEM's -13.00% return. Over the past 10 years, GIB has underperformed AEM with an annualized return of 4.42%, while AEM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.
GIB
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- 6M
- -28.26%
- YTD
- -27.08%
- 1Y
- -32.90%
- 3Y*
- -13.48%
- 5Y*
- -5.94%
- 10Y*
- 4.42%
AEM
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -6.90%
- 6M
- -22.83%
- YTD
- -13.00%
- 1Y
- 23.66%
- 3Y*
- 46.01%
- 5Y*
- 21.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.59%
GIB vs. AEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIB CGI Inc | -27.08% | -15.19% | 2.07% | 24.47% | -2.68% | 11.59% | -5.26% | 36.80% | 12.63% | 13.12% |
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | -13.00% | 119.53% | 46.04% | 8.98% | 1.08% | -22.81% | 17.39% | 54.18% | -11.51% | 10.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIB and AEM is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 1998 | 0.13 |
The correlation between GIB and AEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.17 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GIB:
$14.57B
AEM:
$73.44B
GIB:
CA$7.71
AEM:
$10.60
GIB:
12.31
AEM:
13.85
GIB:
1.54
AEM:
0.22
GIB:
1.26
AEM:
5.47
GIB:
2.02
AEM:
2.80
GIB:
CA$16.35B
AEM:
$13.51B
GIB:
CA$3.35B
AEM:
$8.28B
GIB:
CA$2.98B
AEM:
$9.72B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIB vs. AEM — Risk / Return Rank
GIB
AEM
GIB vs. AEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CGI Inc (GIB) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIB | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.13 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 0.60 | -1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | 1.49 | -3.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIB vs. AEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIB drawdown since its inception was -86.78%, roughly equal to the maximum AEM drawdown of -90.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIB and AEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIB | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.78% | -90.49% | +3.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.72% | -42.41% | +2.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.54% | -42.41% | -7.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.54% | -42.41% | -7.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.54% | -53.86% | +4.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.78% | -41.62% | -3.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.53% | -46.63% | +14.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.14% | 17.09% | +5.05% |
Volatility
GIB vs. AEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CGI Inc (GIB) is 9.99%, while Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) has a volatility of 13.36%. This indicates that GIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIB | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.99% | 13.36% | -3.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.79% | 36.30% | -10.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.27% | 44.49% | -15.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.12% | 37.23% | -14.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.68% | 37.44% | -14.76% |
Dividends
GIB vs. AEM - Dividend Comparison
GIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than AEM's 1.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 1.16% | 0.94% | 2.05% | 2.92% | 3.08% | 2.63% | 2.36% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.89% | 0.86% | 1.22% |
GIB CGI Inc | 0.71% | 0.48% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GIB vs. AEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CGI Inc and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GIB vs. AEM - Profitability Comparison
GIB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CGI Inc reported a gross profit of 684.28M and revenue of 4.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.4%.
AEM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 2.72B and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.4%.
GIB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CGI Inc reported an operating income of 684.28M and revenue of 4.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.4%.
AEM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 2.56B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 62.4%.
GIB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CGI Inc reported a net income of 445.87M and revenue of 4.17B, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.
AEM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 1.70B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 41.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GIB and AEM have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AEM has higher volatility (13.36%) compared to GIB (9.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIB dropped -86.78% vs AEM's -90.49%.
AEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIB and AEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer