GIAX vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

GIAX (Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GIAX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Nicholas, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. GIAX is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, GIAX returned 22.47% vs 22.07% for QYLD. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GIAX charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

GIAX vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIAX achieves a 16.24% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 8.25% return.

GIAX

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: -0.38%
• YTD: 16.24%
• 6M: 13.93%
• 1Y: 22.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QYLD

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 1.12%
• YTD: 8.25%
• 6M: 7.89%
• 1Y: 22.07%
• 3Y*: 14.40%
• 5Y*: 8.29%
• 10Y*: 10.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIAX vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GIAX Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF	16.24%	11.73%	2.94%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	8.25%	9.28%	11.14%

Correlation

The correlation between GIAX and QYLD is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2024	0.77

The correlation between GIAX and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

GIAX vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GIAX	QYLD
Technology	43.4%	58.7%
Communication Services	15.0%	14.3%
Financial Services	12.3%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	11.4%
Industrials	5.1%	2.6%
Utilities	3.3%	1.2%
Basic Materials	3.0%	1.0%
Healthcare	2.5%	3.7%
Real Estate	2.4%	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	1.1%	6.4%
Energy	1.1%	0.5%

Return for Risk

GIAX vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIAX

GIAX Risk / Return Rank: 31
GIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
GIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
GIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
GIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
GIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 88
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 91
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIAX vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GIAX	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	2.29	-1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.42	3.21	-1.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.51	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.28	4.46	-3.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.17	24.33	-19.16

GIAX vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIAX and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GIAX vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIAX drawdown since its inception was -20.38%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIAX and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	GIAX	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.38%	-24.75%	+4.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.62%	-4.97%	-12.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.56%	-1.77%	-5.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.08%	-3.82%	+0.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.35%	0.91%	+3.44%

Volatility

GIAX vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) has a higher volatility of 10.26% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 4.78%. This indicates that GIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GIAX	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.26%	4.78%	+5.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.97%	8.45%	+12.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.31%	9.69%	+13.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.05%	14.84%	+7.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.05%	15.55%	+6.50%

GIAX vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

GIAX vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

GIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.22%, more than QYLD's 11.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GIAX Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF	25.22%	25.62%	10.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.64%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GIAX and QYLD in my portfolio?

GIAX and QYLD have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GIAX or QYLD?

GIAX has higher volatility (10.26%) compared to QYLD (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIAX dropped -20.38% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

Which ETF is better, GIAX or QYLD?

On 1-year performance, GIAX leads with 22.47% vs 22.07% for QYLD. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 4.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GIAX or QYLD?

Over the 1-year period, GIAX has performed better with a 22.47% return vs 22.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GIAX or QYLD?

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for GIAX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GIAX or QYLD?

GIAX has the higher dividend yield at 25.22%, compared with 11.64% for QYLD.

What is the main difference between GIAX and QYLD?

GIAX is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for GIAX and 0.60% for QYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.