PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIAX vs. XPAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GIAX vs. XPAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) and Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GIAX vs. XPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GIAX
Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF
-7.75%11.73%1.09%
XPAY
Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF
-3.96%16.78%3.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIAX achieves a -7.75% return, which is significantly lower than XPAY's -3.96% return.


GIAX

1D
1.28%
1M
-5.88%
YTD
-7.75%
6M
-8.45%
1Y
9.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XPAY

1D
0.86%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-3.96%
6M
-2.20%
1Y
17.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GIAX vs. XPAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than XPAY's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GIAX vs. XPAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIAX
GIAX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
GIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
GIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

XPAY
XPAY Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIAX vs. XPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) and Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GIAXXPAYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.41

0.96

-0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.74

1.44

-0.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.22

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

1.53

-0.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.63

6.71

-4.08

GIAX vs. XPAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the XPAY Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIAX and XPAY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GIAXXPAYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

0.96

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.64

-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between GIAX and XPAY is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GIAX vs. XPAY - Dividend Comparison

GIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.50%, more than XPAY's 22.92% yield.


Drawdowns

GIAX vs. XPAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIAX drawdown since its inception was -20.38%, which is greater than XPAY's maximum drawdown of -18.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIAX and XPAY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GIAXXPAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.38%

-18.20%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.62%

-11.55%

-6.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.88%

-6.03%

-5.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.07%

-2.56%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

2.63%

+1.41%

Volatility

GIAX vs. XPAY - Volatility Comparison

Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) has a higher volatility of 12.19% compared to Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) at 5.30%. This indicates that GIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XPAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GIAXXPAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.19%

5.30%

+6.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.23%

9.42%

+8.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.90%

18.05%

+5.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.93%

17.25%

+3.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.93%

17.25%

+3.68%