GIAX vs. BTCI
GIAX (Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF) and BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GIAX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Nicholas, while BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GIAX returned 16.87% vs -42.24% for BTCI. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GIAX charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BTCI.
Performance
GIAX vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIAX achieves a 11.86% return, which is significantly higher than BTCI's -26.61% return.
GIAX
- 1D
- -2.03%
- 1M
- -4.40%
- 6M
- 6.86%
- YTD
- 11.86%
- 1Y
- 16.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCI
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- 6M
- -29.51%
- YTD
- -26.61%
- 1Y
- -42.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GIAX vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GIAX Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF | 11.86% | 11.73% | -0.07% |
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | -26.61% | -1.09% | 26.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIAX and BTCI is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024 | 0.52 |
The correlation between GIAX and BTCI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIAX vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank
GIAX
BTCI
GIAX vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIAX | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.82 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | -0.87 | +1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.56 | -1.46 | +5.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIAX vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIAX drawdown since its inception was -20.38%, smaller than the maximum BTCI drawdown of -48.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIAX and BTCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIAX | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.38% | -48.42% | +28.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.62% | -48.42% | +30.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.04% | -45.73% | +34.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -16.97% | +13.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.74% | 28.99% | -24.25% |
Volatility
GIAX vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) is 8.37%, while NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a volatility of 10.63%. This indicates that GIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIAX | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.37% | 10.63% | -2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.56% | 31.57% | -10.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.98% | 39.92% | -15.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.16% | 40.10% | -17.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.16% | 40.10% | -17.94% |
GIAX vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCI's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
GIAX vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison
GIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.81%, less than BTCI's 43.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | 43.77% | 36.46% | 6.76% |
GIAX Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF | 25.81% | 25.62% | 10.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIAX and BTCI have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCI has higher volatility (10.63%) compared to GIAX (8.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIAX dropped -20.38% vs BTCI's -48.42%.
On 1-year performance, GIAX leads with 16.87% vs -42.24% for BTCI. On fees, GIAX is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, GIAX has been the lower-risk option at 8.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GIAX has performed better with a 16.87% return vs -42.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GIAX is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.
BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 43.77%, compared with 25.81% for GIAX.
GIAX is categorized as Derivative Income, while BTCI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for GIAX and 0.99% for BTCI.
GIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIAX and BTCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer