GIAX vs. BTCI
GIAX (Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF) and BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GIAX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Nicholas, while BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GIAX returned 26.16% vs -35.09% for BTCI. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GIAX charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BTCI.
Performance
GIAX vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIAX achieves a 18.01% return, which is significantly higher than BTCI's -26.19% return.
GIAX
- 1D
- -2.97%
- 1M
- 3.34%
- YTD
- 18.01%
- 6M
- 15.43%
- 1Y
- 26.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCI
- 1D
- -3.23%
- 1M
- -17.15%
- YTD
- -26.19%
- 6M
- -26.22%
- 1Y
- -35.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GIAX vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GIAX Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF | 18.01% | 11.73% | -0.07% |
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | -26.19% | -1.09% | 26.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIAX and BTCI is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024 | 0.54 |
The correlation between GIAX and BTCI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIAX vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank
GIAX
BTCI
GIAX vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIAX | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.86 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | -0.75 | +2.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.10 | -1.30 | +7.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIAX vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIAX drawdown since its inception was -20.38%, smaller than the maximum BTCI drawdown of -47.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIAX and BTCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIAX | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.38% | -47.16% | +26.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.62% | -47.16% | +29.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.15% | -45.42% | +39.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.06% | -16.05% | +12.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.30% | 27.00% | -22.70% |
Volatility
GIAX vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) is 10.26%, while NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a volatility of 12.63%. This indicates that GIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIAX | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.26% | 12.63% | -2.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.98% | 31.38% | -10.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.27% | 39.73% | -16.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.04% | 40.33% | -18.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.04% | 40.33% | -18.29% |
GIAX vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCI's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
GIAX vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison
GIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.84%, less than BTCI's 48.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | 48.44% | 36.46% | 6.76% |
GIAX Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF | 24.84% | 25.62% | 10.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIAX and BTCI have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCI has higher volatility (12.63%) compared to GIAX (10.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIAX dropped -20.38% vs BTCI's -47.16%.
On 1-year performance, GIAX leads with 26.16% vs -35.09% for BTCI. On fees, GIAX is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, GIAX has been the lower-risk option at 10.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GIAX has performed better with a 26.16% return vs -35.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GIAX is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.
BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 48.44%, compared with 24.84% for GIAX.
GIAX is categorized as Derivative Income, while BTCI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for GIAX and 0.99% for BTCI.
GIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIAX and BTCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer