PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIAX vs. BTCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIAX vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIAX achieves a 22.12% return, which is significantly higher than BTCI's -22.74% return.


GIAX

1D
-2.89%
1M
12.88%
YTD
22.12%
6M
19.89%
1Y
31.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BTCI

1D
-2.56%
1M
-16.29%
YTD
-22.74%
6M
-26.41%
1Y
-33.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIAX vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GIAX
Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF
22.12%11.73%-0.17%
BTCI
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
-22.74%-1.09%28.24%

Correlation

The correlation between GIAX and BTCI is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024

0.53

The correlation between GIAX and BTCI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIAX vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIAX
GIAX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
GIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
GIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCI
BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIAX vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GIAXBTCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

0.87

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

-0.75

+2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.84

-1.34

+9.18

GIAX vs. BTCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is higher than the BTCI Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIAX and BTCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GIAXBTCIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

-0.86

+2.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

-0.03

+1.00

Drawdowns

GIAX vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIAX drawdown since its inception was -20.38%, smaller than the maximum BTCI drawdown of -44.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIAX and BTCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIAXBTCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.38%

-44.98%

+24.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.62%

-44.98%

+27.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.89%

-42.87%

+39.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.99%

-15.18%

+12.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

25.05%

-20.98%

Volatility

GIAX vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison

Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) have volatilities of 8.06% and 8.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIAXBTCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.06%

8.35%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.80%

30.94%

-11.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.77%

38.93%

-17.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.46%

40.11%

-18.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.46%

40.11%

-18.65%

GIAX vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCI's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

GIAX vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison

GIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.33%, less than BTCI's 43.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BTCI
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
43.16%36.46%6.76%
GIAX
Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF
22.33%25.62%10.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


GIAX and BTCI have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTCI has higher volatility (8.35%) compared to GIAX (8.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIAX dropped -20.38% vs BTCI's -44.98%.

On 1-year performance, GIAX leads with 31.82% vs -33.43% for BTCI. On fees, GIAX is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, GIAX has been the lower-risk option at 8.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GIAX has performed better with a 31.82% return vs -33.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GIAX is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.

BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 43.16%, compared with 22.33% for GIAX.

GIAX is categorized as Derivative Income, while BTCI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for GIAX and 0.99% for BTCI.

GIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIAX and BTCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer