GIAX vs. QDTE
GIAX (Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF) and QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GIAX returned 31.31% vs 39.17% for QDTE. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.97% expense ratio.
Performance
GIAX vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIAX achieves a 21.71% return, which is significantly higher than QDTE's 16.06% return.
GIAX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 11.10%
- YTD
- 21.71%
- 6M
- 17.83%
- 1Y
- 31.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDTE
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 7.12%
- YTD
- 16.06%
- 6M
- 15.73%
- 1Y
- 39.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GIAX vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GIAX Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF | 21.71% | 11.73% | 3.74% |
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 16.06% | 19.32% | 13.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIAX and QDTE is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2024 | 0.84 |
The correlation between GIAX and QDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
GIAX vs. QDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GIAX
QDTE
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Technology
GIAX
QDTE
-
Communication Services
GIAX
QDTE
-
Financial Services
GIAX
QDTE
Consumer Cyclical
GIAX
QDTE
-
Industrials
GIAX
QDTE
-
Basic Materials
GIAX
QDTE
-
Utilities
GIAX
QDTE
-
Healthcare
GIAX
QDTE
-
Real Estate
GIAX
QDTE
-
Consumer Defensive
GIAX
QDTE
-
Energy
GIAX
QDTE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIAX vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank
GIAX
QDTE
GIAX vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GIAX | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.46 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 3.86 | -2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.71 | 15.60 | -7.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GIAX | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 2.66 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 1.29 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
GIAX vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIAX drawdown since its inception was -20.38%, smaller than the maximum QDTE drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIAX and QDTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIAX | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.38% | -22.86% | +2.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.62% | -10.20% | -7.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.21% | -0.60% | -2.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.99% | -3.14% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 2.52% | +1.55% |
Volatility
GIAX vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison
Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) has a higher volatility of 8.08% compared to Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) at 3.72%. This indicates that GIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIAX | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.08% | 3.72% | +4.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.81% | 11.01% | +8.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.77% | 14.81% | +6.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 18.42% | +3.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 18.42% | +3.02% |
GIAX vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GIAX and QDTE have an expense ratio of 0.97%.
Dividends
GIAX vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison
GIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.41%, less than QDTE's 43.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GIAX Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF | 22.41% | 25.62% | 10.58% |
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 43.41% | 49.49% | 32.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIAX and QDTE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIAX has higher volatility (8.08%) compared to QDTE (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIAX dropped -20.38% vs QDTE's -22.86%.
On 1-year performance, QDTE leads with 39.17% vs 31.31% for GIAX. Both ETFs have the same 0.97% expense ratio. On volatility, QDTE has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QDTE has performed better with a 39.17% return vs 31.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GIAX and QDTE have the same expense ratio: 0.97% per year.
QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 43.41%, compared with 22.41% for GIAX.
They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Roundhill.
QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIAX and QDTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer