PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIAX vs. QDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIAX vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIAX achieves a 15.63% return, which is significantly higher than QDTE's 12.21% return.


GIAX

1D
-2.02%
1M
1.24%
YTD
15.63%
6M
13.33%
1Y
21.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QDTE

1D
-0.36%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
12.21%
6M
10.80%
1Y
31.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIAX vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GIAX and QDTE is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2024

0.84

The correlation between GIAX and QDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

GIAX vs. QDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GIAX
QDTE

Technology

43.4%

-

Communication Services

15.0%

-

Financial Services

12.3%
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%

-

Industrials

5.1%

-

Utilities

3.3%

-

Basic Materials

3.0%

-

Healthcare

2.5%

-

Real Estate

2.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.1%

-

Energy

1.1%

-

Technology

GIAX
43.4%
QDTE

-

Communication Services

GIAX
15.0%
QDTE

-

Financial Services

GIAX
12.3%
QDTE
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

GIAX
10.8%
QDTE

-

Industrials

GIAX
5.1%
QDTE

-

Utilities

GIAX
3.3%
QDTE

-

Basic Materials

GIAX
3.0%
QDTE

-

Healthcare

GIAX
2.5%
QDTE

-

Real Estate

GIAX
2.4%
QDTE

-

Consumer Defensive

GIAX
1.1%
QDTE

-

Energy

GIAX
1.1%
QDTE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIAX vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIAX
GIAX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
GIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

QDTE
QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIAX vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GIAXQDTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.34

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

3.06

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.09

11.78

-6.68

GIAX vs. QDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the QDTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIAX and QDTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GIAX vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIAX drawdown since its inception was -20.38%, smaller than the maximum QDTE drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIAX and QDTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIAXQDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.38%

-22.86%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.62%

-10.20%

-7.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.05%

-3.90%

-4.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.07%

-3.13%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

2.64%

+1.69%

Volatility

GIAX vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison

Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) has a higher volatility of 10.48% compared to Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) at 8.57%. This indicates that GIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIAXQDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.48%

8.57%

+1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.98%

13.27%

+7.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.34%

16.66%

+6.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.07%

18.97%

+3.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.07%

18.97%

+3.10%

GIAX vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GIAX and QDTE have an expense ratio of 0.97%.


Dividends

GIAX vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

GIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.36%, less than QDTE's 44.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GIAX
Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF
25.36%25.62%10.58%
QDTE
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
44.39%49.49%32.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


GIAX and QDTE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GIAX has higher volatility (10.48%) compared to QDTE (8.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIAX dropped -20.38% vs QDTE's -22.86%.

On 1-year performance, QDTE leads with 31.05% vs 21.99% for GIAX. Both ETFs have the same 0.97% expense ratio. On volatility, QDTE has been the lower-risk option at 8.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QDTE has performed better with a 31.05% return vs 21.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GIAX and QDTE have the same expense ratio: 0.97% per year.

QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 44.39%, compared with 25.36% for GIAX.

They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Roundhill.

QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIAX and QDTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer