PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIAX vs. AMDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIAX vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIAX achieves a 22.12% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 192.40% return.


GIAX

1D
-2.89%
1M
12.88%
YTD
22.12%
6M
19.89%
1Y
31.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDW

1D
4.91%
1M
72.80%
YTD
192.40%
6M
186.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIAX vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GIAX
Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF
22.12%2.58%
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
192.40%34.24%

Correlation

The correlation between GIAX and AMDW is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.56

GIAX vs. AMDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GIAX
AMDW

Technology

36.5%
28.6%

Communication Services

14.8%

-

Financial Services

14.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%

-

Industrials

5.8%

-

Basic Materials

4.4%

-

Utilities

4.0%

-

Healthcare

3.1%

-

Real Estate

2.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.4%

-

Energy

1.3%

-

Technology

GIAX
36.5%
AMDW
28.6%

Communication Services

GIAX
14.8%
AMDW

-

Financial Services

GIAX
14.0%
AMDW

-

Consumer Cyclical

GIAX
11.8%
AMDW

-

Industrials

GIAX
5.8%
AMDW

-

Basic Materials

GIAX
4.4%
AMDW

-

Utilities

GIAX
4.0%
AMDW

-

Healthcare

GIAX
3.1%
AMDW

-

Real Estate

GIAX
2.9%
AMDW

-

Consumer Defensive

GIAX
1.4%
AMDW

-

Energy

GIAX
1.3%
AMDW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIAX vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIAX
GIAX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
GIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
GIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIAX vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GIAXAMDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.84

GIAX vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GIAXAMDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

4.83

-3.86

Drawdowns

GIAX vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIAX drawdown since its inception was -20.38%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIAX and AMDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIAXAMDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.38%

-34.64%

+14.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.89%

0.00%

-2.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.99%

-14.66%

+11.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

Volatility

GIAX vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIAXAMDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.77%

81.56%

-59.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.46%

81.56%

-60.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.46%

81.56%

-60.10%

GIAX vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

GIAX vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

GIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.33%, less than AMDW's 28.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
28.98%34.78%0.00%
GIAX
Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF
22.33%25.62%10.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


GIAX and AMDW have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GIAX is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GIAX is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 28.98%, compared with 22.33% for GIAX.

They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for GIAX and 0.99% for AMDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIAX and AMDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer