GHTA vs. EAOM
Compare and contrast key facts about Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM).
GHTA and EAOM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GHTA is an actively managed fund by Goose Hollow. It was launched on Nov 16, 2021. EAOM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the BlackRock ESG Aware Moderate Allocation Index. It was launched on Jun 12, 2020.
Performance
GHTA vs. EAOM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GHTA vs. EAOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHTA Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF | -0.51% | 10.06% | 4.78% | 14.10% | 1.99% | -0.78% |
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF | -0.60% | 12.90% | 7.29% | 11.83% | -15.48% | -0.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHTA achieves a -0.51% return, which is significantly higher than EAOM's -0.60% return.
GHTA
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 6M
- -0.96%
- 1Y
- 5.84%
- 3Y*
- 7.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EAOM
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- -0.60%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 10.92%
- 3Y*
- 8.70%
- 5Y*
- 3.67%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GHTA vs. EAOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GHTA has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOM's 0.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GHTA vs. EAOM — Risk / Return Rank
GHTA
EAOM
GHTA vs. EAOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GHTA | EAOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.48 | 1.37 | -0.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.77 | 1.99 | -1.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.28 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | 1.99 | -1.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.36 | 8.33 | -5.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GHTA | EAOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 | 1.37 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.65 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between GHTA and EAOM is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GHTA vs. EAOM - Dividend Comparison
GHTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than EAOM's 2.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHTA Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF | 3.85% | 3.84% | 2.46% | 2.32% | 0.38% | 0.41% | 0.00% |
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF | 2.91% | 2.89% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 1.93% | 1.32% | 1.02% |
Drawdowns
GHTA vs. EAOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHTA drawdown since its inception was -13.92%, smaller than the maximum EAOM drawdown of -20.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHTA and EAOM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHTA | EAOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.92% | -20.73% | +6.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.15% | -5.67% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.25% | -3.31% | -1.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.53% | -5.09% | +1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 1.35% | +1.27% |
Volatility
GHTA vs. EAOM - Volatility Comparison
Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) have volatilities of 3.42% and 3.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GHTA | EAOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | 3.27% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.06% | 4.82% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.31% | 8.04% | +4.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.06% | 8.01% | +4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.06% | 7.91% | +4.15% |