GHTA vs. BAMY

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) and Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY).

GHTA and BAMY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GHTA is an actively managed fund by Goose Hollow. It was launched on Nov 16, 2021. BAMY is an actively managed fund by Brookstone. It was launched on Sep 27, 2023.

Performance

GHTA vs. BAMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) and Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GHTA vs. BAMY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GHTA Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF	-0.65%	10.06%	4.78%	11.80%
BAMY Brookstone Yield ETF	-0.46%	12.93%	10.60%	5.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GHTA achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly lower than BAMY's -0.46% return.

GHTA

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -4.46%
• YTD: -0.65%
• 6M: -0.62%
• 1Y: 6.01%
• 3Y*: 7.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMY

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: -1.05%
• YTD: -0.46%
• 6M: 2.71%
• 1Y: 12.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GHTA vs. BAMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GHTA has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMY's 1.48% expense ratio.

BAMY

Brookstone Yield ETF

GHTA

Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF

Return for Risk

GHTA vs. BAMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GHTA

GHTA Risk / Return Rank: 27
GHTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
GHTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
GHTA Omega Ratio Rank: 28
GHTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
GHTA Martin Ratio Rank: 27

BAMY

BAMY Risk / Return Rank: 91
BAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
BAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
BAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 95
BAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
BAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GHTA vs. BAMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) and Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GHTA	BAMY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.49	1.87	-1.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.79	2.73	-1.94
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.46	-0.34
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.57	2.75	-2.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.21	15.03	-12.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GHTA vs. BAMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GHTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the BAMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GHTA and BAMY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GHTA	BAMY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49	1.87	-1.38
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	1.85	-1.30

Correlation

The correlation between GHTA and BAMY is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

GHTA vs. BAMY - Dividend Comparison

GHTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, less than BAMY's 8.04% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GHTA Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF	3.86%	3.84%	2.46%	2.32%	0.38%	0.41%
BAMY Brookstone Yield ETF	8.04%	7.16%	8.20%	1.96%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

GHTA vs. BAMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHTA drawdown since its inception was -13.92%, which is greater than BAMY's maximum drawdown of -6.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHTA and BAMY.

Drawdown Indicators

	GHTA	BAMY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.92%	-6.03%	-7.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.15%	-4.60%	-5.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.39%	-1.42%	-3.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.53%	-0.54%	-2.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.60%	0.84%	+1.76%

Volatility

GHTA vs. BAMY - Volatility Comparison

Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) has a higher volatility of 3.45% compared to Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY) at 2.00%. This indicates that GHTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GHTA	BAMY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.45%	2.00%	+1.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.07%	3.54%	+1.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.32%	6.77%	+5.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.07%	6.16%	+5.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.07%	6.16%	+5.91%