GHTA vs. CTAP
GHTA (Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF) and CTAP (Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. GHTA charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CTAP.
Performance
GHTA vs. CTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHTA achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than CTAP's 8.91% return.
GHTA
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -1.52%
- 6M
- -1.30%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 7.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.38%
CTAP
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 4.75%
- 6M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $13.32M | $7.01M | $3.57M | |
| $79.73K | $68.58K | $100.66K |
GHTA vs. CTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GHTA Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF | 1.11% | -0.91% |
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 8.91% | 2.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between GHTA and CTAP is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GHTA vs. CTAP — Risk / Return Rank
GHTA
CTAP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GHTA vs. CTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GHTA | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.75 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GHTA vs. CTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHTA drawdown since its inception was -13.92%, smaller than the maximum CTAP drawdown of -20.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHTA and CTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHTA | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.92% | -20.48% | +6.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.71% | -14.68% | +10.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -5.27% | +1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | — | — |
Volatility
GHTA vs. CTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GHTA | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.84% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.58% | 24.78% | -17.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.79% | 24.78% | -12.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.79% | 24.78% | -12.99% |
GHTA vs. CTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GHTA has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than CTAP's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
GHTA vs. CTAP - Dividend Comparison
GHTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than CTAP's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GHTA Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF | 3.79% | 3.84% | 2.46% | 2.32% | 0.38% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GHTA and CTAP have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for GHTA.
GHTA has the higher dividend yield at 3.79%, compared with 1.83% for CTAP.
They also come from different issuers: Goose Hollow and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for GHTA and 0.10% for CTAP.
Find the right allocation for GHTA and CTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer