GHTA vs. CTAP
GHTA (Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF) and CTAP (Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GHTA charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CTAP.
Performance
GHTA vs. CTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHTA achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly lower than CTAP's 8.42% return.
GHTA
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 1.97%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- 1Y
- 6.36%
- 3Y*
- 8.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTAP
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -12.31%
- YTD
- 8.42%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GHTA vs. CTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GHTA Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF | 1.97% | -0.91% |
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 8.42% | 2.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between GHTA and CTAP is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GHTA vs. CTAP — Risk / Return Rank
GHTA
CTAP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GHTA vs. CTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GHTA | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.52 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GHTA vs. CTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHTA drawdown since its inception was -13.92%, smaller than the maximum CTAP drawdown of -15.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHTA and CTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHTA | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.92% | -15.19% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.89% | -15.07% | +12.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -2.99% | -0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | — | — |
Volatility
GHTA vs. CTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GHTA | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.76% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.92% | 24.37% | -16.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.90% | 24.37% | -12.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.90% | 24.37% | -12.47% |
GHTA vs. CTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GHTA has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than CTAP's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
GHTA vs. CTAP - Dividend Comparison
GHTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, more than CTAP's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GHTA Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF | 3.76% | 3.84% | 2.46% | 2.32% | 0.38% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GHTA and CTAP have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for GHTA.
GHTA has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 0.73% for CTAP.
They also come from different issuers: Goose Hollow and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for GHTA and 0.10% for CTAP.
Find the right allocation for GHTA and CTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer