GHTA vs. GAA

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

GHTA (Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF) and GAA (Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GHTA returned 8.87%/yr vs 13.18%/yr for GAA. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GHTA charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for GAA.

Performance

GHTA vs. GAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) and Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GHTA achieves a 2.12% return, which is significantly lower than GAA's 7.45% return.

GHTA

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: 2.12%
• 6M: 2.06%
• 1Y: 5.39%
• 3Y*: 8.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GAA

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -1.82%
• YTD: 7.45%
• 6M: 6.53%
• 1Y: 17.66%
• 3Y*: 13.18%
• 5Y*: 6.18%
• 10Y*: 7.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GHTA vs. GAA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GHTA Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF	2.12%	10.06%	4.78%	14.10%	1.99%	-1.42%
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF	7.45%	18.76%	6.67%	7.65%	-8.47%	-1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between GHTA and GAA is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021	0.51

The correlation between GHTA and GAA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GHTA vs. GAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GHTA

GHTA Risk / Return Rank: 20
GHTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
GHTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
GHTA Omega Ratio Rank: 19
GHTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
GHTA Martin Ratio Rank: 20

GAA

GAA Risk / Return Rank: 68
GAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
GAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
GAA Omega Ratio Rank: 67
GAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
GAA Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GHTA vs. GAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) and Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GHTA	GAA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.69	1.88	-1.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.06	2.63	-1.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.35	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.88	3.07	-2.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.12	11.38	-9.26

GHTA vs. GAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GHTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the GAA Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GHTA and GAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GHTA vs. GAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHTA drawdown since its inception was -13.92%, smaller than the maximum GAA drawdown of -26.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHTA and GAA.

Drawdown Indicators

	GHTA	GAA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.92%	-26.57%	+12.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.18%	-5.78%	-0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.91%	-7.18%	-6.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.47%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-26.57%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.75%	-2.43%	-0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.51%	-3.84%	+0.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.55%	1.56%	+0.99%

Volatility

GHTA vs. GAA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) is 1.62%, while Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that GHTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GHTA	GAA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.62%	3.56%	-1.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.78%	8.01%	-2.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.87%	9.43%	-1.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.89%	11.35%	+0.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.89%	11.10%	+0.79%

GHTA vs. GAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GHTA has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than GAA's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

GHTA vs. GAA - Dividend Comparison

GHTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, more than GAA's 3.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF	3.54%	4.24%	3.88%	3.73%	6.05%	4.21%	2.73%	3.32%	3.01%	2.36%	2.82%	2.49%
GHTA Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF	3.76%	3.84%	2.46%	2.32%	0.38%	0.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GHTA and GAA in my portfolio?

GHTA and GAA have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GHTA or GAA?

GAA has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to GHTA (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHTA dropped -13.92% vs GAA's -26.57%.

Which ETF is better, GHTA or GAA?

On 3-year performance, GAA leads with 13.18% vs 8.87% for GHTA. On fees, GAA is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, GHTA has been the lower-risk option at 1.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GHTA or GAA?

Over the 3-year period, GAA has performed better with a 13.18% return vs 8.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GHTA or GAA?

GAA is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for GHTA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GHTA or GAA?

GHTA has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 3.54% for GAA.

What is the main difference between GHTA and GAA?

They also come from different issuers: Goose Hollow and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for GHTA and 0.41% for GAA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.