GHTA vs. ASET

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GHTA (Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF) and ASET (FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. GHTA is actively managed, while ASET is passively managed. GHTA charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for ASET.

Performance

GHTA vs. ASET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GHTA

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 2.24%
• 6M: 1.10%
• 1Y: 6.74%
• 3Y*: 9.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASET

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GHTA vs. ASET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GHTA Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF	-1.47%
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	0.00%

GHTA vs. ASET - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GHTA	ASET
Technology	25.8%	0.2%
Industrials	21.2%	16.3%
Financial Services	9.9%	-
Real Estate	9.0%	41.6%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	0.1%
Utilities	6.7%	12.8%
Basic Materials	5.1%	5.8%
Energy	4.5%	7.8%
Healthcare	4.4%	2.2%
Communication Services	4.3%	12.1%
Consumer Defensive	1.3%	1.1%

Return for Risk

GHTA vs. ASET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GHTA

GHTA Risk / Return Rank: 24
GHTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
GHTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
GHTA Omega Ratio Rank: 24
GHTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
GHTA Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GHTA vs. ASET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GHTA	ASET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.09	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.71	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GHTA	ASET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	—	—

Drawdowns

GHTA vs. ASET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHTA drawdown since its inception was -13.92%, which is greater than ASET's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHTA and ASET.

Drawdown Indicators

	GHTA	ASET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.92%	0.00%	-13.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.63%	0.00%	-2.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.51%	0.00%	-3.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GHTA	ASET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.90%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.69%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.11%	0.00%	+8.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.94%	0.00%	+11.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.94%	0.00%	+11.94%

GHTA vs. ASET - Expense Ratio Comparison

GHTA has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than ASET's 0.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

GHTA vs. ASET - Dividend Comparison

GHTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, while ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GHTA Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF	3.75%	3.84%	2.46%	2.32%	0.38%	0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, GHTA or ASET?

On fees, ASET is cheaper at 0.57% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GHTA or ASET?

ASET is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for GHTA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GHTA or ASET?

GHTA has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.

What is the main difference between GHTA and ASET?

They also come from different issuers: Goose Hollow and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for GHTA and 0.57% for ASET.