GGUS vs. GPIQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GGUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF) and GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GGUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GPIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. GGUS is passively managed, while GPIQ is actively managed. Over the past year, GGUS returned 17.87% vs 32.06% for GPIQ. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GGUS charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIQ.

Performance

GGUS vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGUS achieves a 3.10% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's 14.86% return.

GGUS

• 1D: -1.61%
• 1M: -2.70%
• YTD: 3.10%
• 6M: 1.71%
• 1Y: 17.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GPIQ

• 1D: -2.96%
• 1M: -0.00%
• YTD: 14.86%
• 6M: 13.78%
• 1Y: 32.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGUS vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GGUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF	3.10%	17.32%	30.88%	4.54%
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	14.86%	19.77%	23.22%	4.00%

Correlation

The correlation between GGUS and GPIQ is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023	0.96

The correlation between GGUS and GPIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

GGUS vs. GPIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GGUS	GPIQ
Technology	48.7%	58.7%
Consumer Cyclical	12.7%	11.6%
Communication Services	9.7%	14.1%
Healthcare	9.5%	3.6%
Industrials	6.5%	2.6%
Financial Services	6.5%	0.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	6.4%
Utilities	1.3%	1.3%
Real Estate	0.6%	0.1%
Energy	0.5%	0.5%
Basic Materials	0.4%	1.0%

Return for Risk

GGUS vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGUS

GGUS Risk / Return Rank: 31
GGUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
GGUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
GGUS Omega Ratio Rank: 32
GGUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
GGUS Martin Ratio Rank: 30

GPIQ

GPIQ Risk / Return Rank: 69
GPIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
GPIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
GPIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 68
GPIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
GPIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGUS vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GGUS	GPIQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	2.12	-0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	2.79	-1.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.39	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.20	3.38	-2.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.05	14.28	-10.23

GGUS vs. GPIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the GPIQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGUS and GPIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GGUS vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGUS drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, which is greater than GPIQ's maximum drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGUS and GPIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	GGUS	GPIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.59%	-21.06%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.91%	-9.51%	-5.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.38%	-3.21%	-2.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.21%	-2.27%	-0.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.42%	2.25%	+2.17%

Volatility

GGUS vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) is 5.77%, while Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) has a volatility of 7.78%. This indicates that GGUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GGUS	GPIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.77%	7.78%	-2.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.20%	12.52%	-0.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.70%	15.17%	+0.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.06%	17.88%	+1.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.06%	17.88%	+1.18%

GGUS vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGUS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

GGUS vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison

GGUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than GPIQ's 9.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GGUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF	0.43%	0.43%	0.68%	0.00%
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	9.60%	9.81%	9.18%	1.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GGUS and GPIQ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, GGUS and GPIQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GGUS or GPIQ?

GPIQ has higher volatility (7.78%) compared to GGUS (5.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGUS dropped -22.59% vs GPIQ's -21.06%.

Which ETF is better, GGUS or GPIQ?

On 1-year performance, GPIQ leads with 32.06% vs 17.87% for GGUS. On fees, GGUS is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, GGUS has been the lower-risk option at 5.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GGUS or GPIQ?

Over the 1-year period, GPIQ has performed better with a 32.06% return vs 17.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GGUS or GPIQ?

GGUS is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GPIQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GGUS or GPIQ?

GPIQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.60%, compared with 0.43% for GGUS.

What is the main difference between GGUS and GPIQ?

GGUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GPIQ is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GGUS and 0.29% for GPIQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.