PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GGP.L vs. SLVP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GGP.L vs. SLVP

Last updated Jul 1, 2026
See Documentation

GGP.L (Greatland Gold plc) is a stock, while SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) is Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. Over the past 10 years, GGP.L returned 59.55%/yr vs 9.89%/yr for SLVP. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GGP.L vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GGP.L is traded in GBp, while SLVP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SLVP values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGP.L achieves a 16.92% return, which is significantly higher than SLVP's -8.07% return. Over the past 10 years, GGP.L has outperformed SLVP with an annualized return of 59.55%, while SLVP has yielded a comparatively lower 9.89% annualized return.

GGP.L

1D
-3.71%
1M
-16.85%
YTD
16.92%
6M
16.74%
1Y
84.70%
3Y*
61.76%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
59.55%

SLVP

1D
-0.30%
1M
-15.08%
YTD
-8.07%
6M
-9.68%
1Y
83.36%
3Y*
47.08%
5Y*
17.12%
10Y*
9.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGP.L vs. SLVP - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGP.L
Greatland Gold plc		16.92%309.83%-35.50%23.25%-50.00%-56.64%1,950.00%-0.55%-3.21%1,000.00%
SLVP
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF		-8.07%181.27%16.47%-7.19%-8.31%-22.81%51.85%32.47%-17.48%-4.51%

Correlation

The correlation between GGP.L and SLVP is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012

0.10

Over the past year, GGP.L and SLVP have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Greatland Gold plc

iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF

Often compared with GGP.L:
GGP.L vs. FRES.LGGP.L vs. EDV.LGGP.L vs. CAML.LGGP.L vs. NEMGGP.L vs. PRE.LGGP.L vs. QUBTGGP.L vs. MTL.L
Often compared with SLVP:
SLVP vs. SLVSLVP vs. SILSLVP vs. SSLN.LSLVP vs. PSLVSLVP vs. SIVRSLVP vs. RINGSLVP vs. SLVR.DE

Return for Risk

GGP.L vs. SLVP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GGP.L
GGP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
GGP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GGP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
SLVP
SLVP Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SLVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVP Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVP Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGP.L vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

GGP.LSLVPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.31
1.57

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.90
1.99

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.26

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

2.23

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.65

5.45

+1.19

GGP.L vs. SLVP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the SLVP Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGP.L and SLVP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GGP.L vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGP.L drawdown since its inception was -98.49%, which is greater than SLVP's maximum drawdown of -78.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGP.L and SLVP.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

GGP.LSLVPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.49%

-78.11%

-20.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.07%

-37.55%

+5.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.65%

-37.55%

-18.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.50%

-45.29%

-31.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.35%

-60.02%

-26.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.29%

-33.64%

+10.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.59%

-39.08%

-26.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.70%

15.34%

-2.64%

Volatility

GGP.L vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison

Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) has a higher volatility of 20.24% compared to iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) at 18.44%. This indicates that GGP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

GGP.LSLVPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.24%

18.44%

+1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.51%

43.71%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.07%

53.36%

+10.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.16%

40.32%

+24.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.86%

40.33%

+50.53%

Dividends

GGP.L vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison

GGP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGP.L
Greatland Gold plc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLVP
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF		2.28%1.78%1.05%0.88%0.63%1.63%2.39%2.03%1.28%0.85%2.32%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

GGP.L and SLVP have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGP.L and SLVP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer