GGP.L vs. PPLT
GGP.L (Greatland Gold plc) is a stock, while PPLT (abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF) is Precious Metals fund tracking the LBMA Platinum Price PM. Over the past 10 years, GGP.L returned 59.55%/yr vs 3.34%/yr for PPLT. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GGP.L vs. PPLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GGP.L is traded in GBp, while PPLT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PPLT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGP.L achieves a 16.92% return, which is significantly higher than PPLT's -22.88% return. Over the past 10 years, GGP.L has outperformed PPLT with an annualized return of 59.55%, while PPLT has yielded a comparatively lower 3.34% annualized return.
GGP.L
- 1D
- -3.71%
- 1M
- -16.85%
- YTD
- 16.92%
- 6M
- 16.74%
- 1Y
- 84.70%
- 3Y*
- 61.76%
- 5Y*
- 11.99%
- 10Y*
- 59.55%
PPLT
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- -17.71%
- YTD
- -22.88%
- 6M
- -27.63%
- 1Y
- 19.24%
- 3Y*
- 17.45%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- 3.34%
GGP.L vs. PPLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGP.L Greatland Gold plc | 16.92% | 309.83% | -35.50% | 23.25% | -50.00% | -56.64% | 1,950.00% | -0.55% | -3.21% | 1,000.00% |
PPLT abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF | -22.88% | 108.49% | -7.30% | -12.77% | 23.56% | -9.91% | 7.52% | 16.26% | -9.91% | -6.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGP.L and PPLT is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2010 | 0.08 |
Over the past year, GGP.L and PPLT have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGP.L vs. PPLT — Risk / Return Rank
GGP.L
PPLT
GGP.L vs. PPLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) and abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GGP.L | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.11 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 0.46 | +2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.65 | 1.04 | +5.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GGP.L vs. PPLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGP.L drawdown since its inception was -98.49%, which is greater than PPLT's maximum drawdown of -59.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGP.L and PPLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGP.L | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.49% | -59.31% | -39.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.07% | -42.28% | +10.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.65% | -42.28% | -13.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.50% | -42.28% | -34.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.35% | -44.53% | -41.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.29% | -42.28% | +18.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.59% | -33.43% | -32.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.70% | 18.55% | -5.85% |
Volatility
GGP.L vs. PPLT - Volatility Comparison
Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) has a higher volatility of 20.24% compared to abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) at 11.71%. This indicates that GGP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGP.L | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.24% | 11.71% | +8.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.51% | 41.74% | +2.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.07% | 48.87% | +15.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.16% | 30.82% | +34.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.86% | 27.65% | +63.21% |
Dividends
GGP.L vs. PPLT - Dividend Comparison
Neither GGP.L nor PPLT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GGP.L and PPLT have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GGP.L and PPLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer